now that's depressing...Estel said:If you don't make time for 20 papers = 40 hours worth of study in mathematics, you're going to fail.
o rly?Estel said:If you don't make time for 20 papers = 40 hours worth of study in mathematics, you're going to fail.
bull shit .. .........Estel said:If you don't make time for 20 papers = 40 hours worth of study in mathematics, you're going to fail.
get stuck on first question, sit there and stare at paper, get stuck stuck, continue sitting there for 2hrs, then move onto next paper and get stuck again.....etc, until your 40hours is upEstel said:If you don't make time for 20 papers = 40 hours worth of study in mathematics, you're going to fail.
Erm ok I'd hardly say thats the case for everyone. I did no where near that many for my trial and got a good result...Estel said:If you don't make time for 20 papers = 40 hours worth of study in mathematics, you're going to fail.
Why get a good result when you can get an absolutely outstanding result?grimreaper said:Erm ok I'd hardly say thats the case for everyone. I did no where near that many for my trial and got a good result...
I woulda done around 40 hours. But then after my first 5 papers I was finishing them in around 1 hourEstel said:"youd need more than 40 hours to pass ext 1...........hahahaha"
sums it up.
"Erm ok I'd hardly say thats the case for everyone. I did no where near that many for my trial and got a good result..."
Quite frankly, I don't believe you.
Edit: of course your study may have involved other techniques, which is different... I'm sure you would've set aside more than 40 hours for maths...
Stop hi-jacking my topic!!Eagles said:Which is better for practice: trial papers or HSC papers