TorMental
Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2010
- Messages
- 139
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2011
I've read people saying 'Acing the HSC', 'its 50%, you still got a chance', 'Its not over yet'.
Yes, the HSC is 50%, but how much significant difference can it make?
For example, say student A got 80% for internal assessment, but 90% in the external assessment. Would your effort and hard improvement be only 85% after averaging them out?
Or lets assume you just get similar internal and external assessments of say, 84 and 85 respectively. Will the actual HSC mark you receive be 84.5 for that particular scenario?
I understand that moderation works in accordance to rank, HSC performance of your cohort, etc etc. But I feel like the HSC, despite any major improvements from a 'wouldbe' external, there is a feeling of hindrance in terms of your internal assessment. (Like it is draggin you down regardless of how much you improve).
Like the most I predict I can improve is 3-5 marks (even if I do well in the HSC, like 90+).
Yes, the HSC is 50%, but how much significant difference can it make?
For example, say student A got 80% for internal assessment, but 90% in the external assessment. Would your effort and hard improvement be only 85% after averaging them out?
Or lets assume you just get similar internal and external assessments of say, 84 and 85 respectively. Will the actual HSC mark you receive be 84.5 for that particular scenario?
I understand that moderation works in accordance to rank, HSC performance of your cohort, etc etc. But I feel like the HSC, despite any major improvements from a 'wouldbe' external, there is a feeling of hindrance in terms of your internal assessment. (Like it is draggin you down regardless of how much you improve).
Like the most I predict I can improve is 3-5 marks (even if I do well in the HSC, like 90+).