I split my time equally for each section (40 40 40), but I found that section one needed a bit more time if I wanted to correctly get q5 right. I did a mini-essay but my conclusion was honestly two- three lines of pretty messy writing (I wrote it in like 30 seconds) so I think q5 will be my downfall because of that conclusion.Man, section 1 screwed me over.... Only got a, b and d fully done.
Section two I just added to and manipulated a bit of my story here and there (did the map one) and section three was alright except for them specifying just one ORT. If they hadn't, I could have just copied my half yearly essay cause the question was pretty much the same.
Sounds interesting. Do you remember the question by any chance?great exam
in chronological order
section three I did post card, feliks and freedom writers (ort) - question suited everything perfectly, and I brought in notions such as identity into it as well
- wrote 6 pages with VERY small writing so I don't get slammed for long paragraphs which naturally occurs when I write big
Creative - used the fish in the bowl - my creative story is about a guy that connects with nature, and I played on the stimulus greatly e.g. when he approaches water, seeing all the fish, escaping from entrapment etc etc
- wrote 6 pages
section 1 - everything up until q5 was full marks imo, all used techniques etc, but q5 I probably lost 1-2 marks - wrote 5 pages here
great exam overall, glad my memorized stuff fit it
now to work on the modules, which believe me, I'm unprepared for, as of yet
hahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahhahaSounds interesting. Do you remember the question by any chance?
Also sounds like ez 100+/105 Big expectations.
haha i did like the same as you for everything except the ordergreat exam
in chronological order
section three I did post card, feliks and freedom writers (ort) - question suited everything perfectly, and I brought in notions such as identity into it as well
- wrote 6 pages with VERY small writing so I don't get slammed for long paragraphs which naturally occurs when I write big
Creative - used the fish in the bowl - my creative story is about a guy that connects with nature, and I played on the stimulus greatly e.g. when he approaches water, seeing all the fish, escaping from entrapment etc etc
- wrote 6 pages
section 1 - everything up until q5 was full marks imo, all used techniques etc, but q5 I probably lost 1-2 marks - wrote 5 pages here
great exam overall, glad my memorized stuff fit it
now to work on the modules, which believe me, I'm unprepared for, as of yet