I feel bad for responding to the trolls but this is just too muchsylvesterbr/rothbard/ etc etc
one of the reason our debates never go anywhere is because most of your economic views are so 18th century.
Yeah except I just made a whole fucking post about why america ISN'T a free market you compelte fucking moronFree market capitalists like yourself are being hoisted by your own petard around the world. Financial bastions and the deluded "temporarily embarrassed millionaire" poor people who regurgitate the propaganda of the plutocracy like you do, subconsciously realize that the writing is on the wall. Your dreams of economic elitism are being cut short by the guillotine of an inevitable French Revolution 2.0.
.
Silly anarchist, can't even read.I dont care wut u say capitalism is fucking evil kill yourselves you dirty bourgeois pig dogs marx greatest man alvie soon me n my comrades will take ur monies over ur burning corpes!1!!
I don't care no economics you are wrong I am right because I say so!1!!
1. Most of us (all of us?) are not in Austria.The major works of the austrian school of economics (the guys we listen to) were published in early-to mid 20th century, and feature many refutations of of 18th and 19th century economic thought.
ahahah you are so dumb1. Most of us (all of us?) are not in Austria.
2. This is the 21st century now.
Can't you just stand behind me and nod? Please?1. Most of us (all of us?) are not in Austria.
2. This is the 21st century now.
you have to be trolling to make that kind of joke1. Most of us (all of us?) are not in Austria.
2. This is the 21st century now.
Karl Marx's theories were notable primarily for (1) nationalisation of the means of production, distribution and exchange, and (2) what he called 'dictatorship of the proletariat'. I haven't seen Leron arguing for either of these, so I can only assume you don't know what Marxism means, and are only referring to Marx generalised way of slagging off something you happen to disagree with.I feel bad for responding to the trolls but this is just too much
Your views are based upon Marx, who whose works were published in the 19th century. His theories revolve around the Neanderthal labour theory of value, which was supported primarily by 18th century economists.
The major works of the austrian school of economics (the guys we listen to) were published in early-to mid 20th century, and feature many refutations of of 18th and 19th century economic thought.
you clearly must have some kind of mental deficiency to be so wrong
wowKarl Marx's theories were notable primarily for (1) nationalisation of the means of production, distribution and exchange, and (2) what he called 'dictatorship of the proletariat'. I haven't seen Leron arguing for either of these, so I can only assume you don't know what Marxism means, and are only referring to Marx generalised way of slagging off something you happen to disagree with.
no m8 ur fucking wrong and I'm right i dunt care wut u say in ur post. karl marx greatest man live!!!!!!wow
can you try adressing the actual content of my post just a little less next time?
WRONG!!! Money spent on programs is spent primarily on wages. And the wages go to pay for things supplied by businesses - so that's how you keep the economy going.and the stupid thing is, as you pile on more and more debt and print more and more money to pay for these extensive programs, you push the economy closer and closer to collapse, wherein all of these programs will abruptly go broke, in which case the poor will be completely fucked.
Just be quiet.WRONG!!! Money spent on programs is spent primarily on wages. And the wages go to pay for things supplied by businesses - so that's how you keep the economy going.
Witness how Australia has avoided the impact of the so-called 'Worldwide recession' through PUBLIC SPENDING programs. Keynes was right - as if that wouldn't be obvious to anyone with a working brain. AND he was American. So howzabout that?
What caused America's debt was fiscal conservatism on the home front - keeping money out of the economy through failing to spend money on thigs like public health an education (both very wage-intensive, so good got circulating money, good for the economy) - and an imperialist foreign policy - and you have Bush to thank for that
And when you're finished that, explain how we escape the situation we have now, in which the free trade agreement with China has taken away all the manual labour opportunities which were once available for people with disabilities. I'm yearning to hear it. Well no - that's a lie. I don't discuss anything with wankers like you.
PS For those of you who, DO have some social skills and are wondering - let me just say - mining has practically no impact at all on our domestic economy, apart from increasing the load through immigration of the miners they bring in. We don't have a resources tax and profits don't stay in the country. But claiming it's good for us is a very common form of misinformation