Quite often the example y=x<sup>4</sup> is used to show the second derivative test is sufficient but not necessary and fails for this example.buchanan said:It can also be generalised:
Successive derivative test
If f<sup>(n)</sup>(x<sub>0</sub>)=0 for n=2,3,4,...,2k and if f<sup>(2k+1)</sup>(x<sub>0</sub>) exists and ≠0, then (x<sub>0</sub>, f(x<sub>0</sub>)) is an inflection point (i.e., if the order ≥2 of the first non-zero derivative has odd parity, then it's an inflection.)
If f<sup>(n)</sup>(x<sub>0</sub>)=0 for n=1,2,3,4,...,2k-1 and if f<sup>(2k)</sup>(x<sub>0</sub>)>0, then (x<sub>0</sub>, f(x<sub>0</sub>)) is a local minimum (i.e., if the parity of the order of the first non-zero derivative is even and the sign of this derivative is positive then it's a local minimum.)
If f<sup>(n)</sup>(x<sub>0</sub>)=0 for n=1,2,3,4,...,2k-1 and if f<sup>(2k)</sup>(x<sub>0</sub>)<0, then (x<sub>0</sub>, f(x<sub>0</sub>)) is a local maximum (i.e., if the parity of the order of the first non-zero derivative is even and the sign of this derivative is negative then it's a local maximum.)
Note that although the conditions in the second and third derivative tests are sufficient but not necessary, nevertheless the conditions in the successive derivative test are both sufficient and necessary (provided the derivatives exist).
However, the successive derivative test still works.
f(0)=f'(0)=f''(0)=f'''(0)=0 but f''''(0)=24 > 0 so (0,0) is a local minimum.
Likewise the third derivative test is sufficient but not necessary and fails for y=x<sup>5</sup>, but the successive derivative test still works.
f''(0)=f'''(0)=f''''(0)=0 but f'''''(0)=120 ≠ 0 so (0,0) is an inflection.
Last edited: