Like Rob, I feel so left out of these. Ho hum. But if any of you ever brave these subjects, here are my opinion on them..
geos116- Man, you have to really like dirt and rocks, like breathe rocks and stuff, to find this subject remotely interesting. Its all group work this subject, if one person bombs out, it effects everyone. Horrible subject. Shit excursion. Spent $120 on the textbook that wasnt referred to or used at all. Stay away.
anth150- absolutely amazing subject, really interesting readings, tutorials are so inviting and open and discussive. Fantastic, I recommend it for an elective! Assignment essays are dead easy; two essays that don't require too much research, but more of your own thinking. There are no tutorial papers! and the final exam is multiple choice; which, if you have turned up to lectures and read most of your tutorial readings, then its a cinch. In fact, even if you havent read anything or turned up to many lectures, its still a cinch. Awesome subject. A++
ahst101-Myth. You sit through many weeks of 2hr lectures to find out you don't really need to be there. Tutorial papers were interesting, Essay had many options, fairly interesting. You don't really need dedication to this subject, a bit of heavy reading though.. but all in all, its interesting (Minus Okinga and Hilliard).
ahst104- stay the fuck away. Too broad, horrible, horrible, horrible. Worst subject ever. So much reading, tutorials are mind numbing, assignments are MASSIVE and HORRIBLE. They should ban and delete subject. This subject was worth the same cp as ANTH150 and anth was a quarter the amount of work this subject was. Its a pain to study for; they give you NO hint or indication on what to study, exam was horrible.
Anyone taken any of these?
geos112 (sounds like a cake walk)
anth275 (sounds interesting)
anth276 (sounds amazing)
pol167 (sounds interesting)
geos235 (puke)
anth277 (sounds great)
els202 (so-so)
ahst270 (mmm ancient sexism)