trishan
Melbourne Private Tutor
The Age, 17th April 2007Melbourne University's brave and bold $185 million overhaul of its academic structure, announced yesterday by its vice-chancellor, Glyn Davis, is the most comprehensive and radical transformation of its kind in the institution's 154 years, let alone Australia's tertiary-education system. In moving away from the English-type degree course to embrace the two-tier teaching structure favoured in the United States, the Melbourne Model (as it is called) turns history and tradition on its head, as well as redefining student requirements and capabilities from 2008 on.
I finished VCE in 2006 and I am currently part of the last cohort of undergradute law students at the University of Melbourne. From next year those who want to do law at Melbourne University will have to do one of a handful of general courses before applying for post-graduate entry. Some may be determined to complete an undergraduate law degree and will have to do so at Monash's Clayton campus. My question to those of you who are going to graduate at the end of this year and onwards is what difference the Melbourne Model has had on your choice of university.
Will you go to Melbourne for its prestige? For the $2000 payout for those who achieve over 98? For the convenient location? For the internationality of your degree (you can study overseas after completing one of the general courses on offer)? Do you praise Melbourne for its iniative?
OR
Do you go to Monash because it offers law, engineering and medicine at an undergraduate level? Will you got Monash as it will shorten the average length of your degree?
How many of you would have gone to Melbourne but because of the model are now seriously considering Monash or one of the other smaller universities?