Benny1103
Member
There was no need to emphasise anything. It was clear what the motivation behind Emily's posts were. Don't bother trying to engage in a circular debate. Your attacks on her are driven by rather stupid ideas. Emily's personal preferences are of little relevance to the merit of VSU. Many of the services which you are arguing for, are not essential to students. As such, people who don't use those services shouldn't have to pay for them. Simple as that. There is nothing selfish about it.Benny, now let me explain something to you ...... I wasn't saying that other people are paying for Emily's course, I was merely emphasising that Emily can not seem to see outside of herself. I was emphasising my opinion that Emily only cares about things that directly relate to her ..... so therefore I was saying that because it is ALL about Emily, then there is no purpose in having anything at Uni that didn't directly relate to Emily, ie any other courses or programs.
Again, grow a brain. On average, how much does each taxpayer contribute to HECS each year? Whatever the number is, you can be sure that it's not anywhere near $400.Oh, by the way, other people ARE paying for Emily's and other students courses. (Unless of course she and others are paying Full Fees) HECS is merely a contribution, it only covers part of the costs involved, the rest is paid by the Government, and therefore taxpayers.
This is so sad, you obviously think I was wrong when I pointed out that you were trying to act all intelligent when you are clearly not. As for getting it right? Read what I typed above this paragraph.Get it right if you are going to go down the 'showing intelligence' road
Last edited: