coroneos said:
The bigger picture??
I'll give u a few reasons why economics is better than physics/chem/bio. Just hear me out for a sec plz.
1. Economics is EASIER (seriously.. no bias) than ANY science subject offered for the HSC course.
2. The topics/sections of the Year 11/Year 12 syllabus are more interrelated and correlate more with each other. i.e. if you understand a bit from other topics, you can deduce what happens due to supply/demand diagram + basic knowledge and therefore not sit in exam room like a random fk (the case with physics).
3. In economics the complexity of concepts are nothing compared to complexity of some bs concepts in physics. There are no bs mathematical calculations or confusingly phrased questions in Physics or Chemistry.
4. Economics is better scaled than Physics/Chem or if not the same. (check BOS scaling thing!!)
5. It is INTERESTING :O lol.. srsly.. im not bsing..
I hope none of you choose to do a science over a humanities subject!!
your line of argument is im too stupid 2 do physics or chem and i cant get marks for bulls*iting in those subjects that i have 2 do eco so i can bulls*it in them and get a few extra marks.
hmmm
INTERESTING... lol not from what i hear . i luv studing atomic, and nuclear physics that is so mad, and that is related to chem heeps.
u also stated that eco is inter-related, i think u have lost the plot kid, not only are the science subjects inter-related within each other they are inter-related with the other sciences and doin all 3 helps u understand concepts.
u no wot i hope u do a Bat of Eco and then marster in actuarial studies, fail the course cos yu are 2 stupid and cant add, then become a manager at Macz 4 the rest of yur life and ern 40k a year, also have a hex fee which takes u 40 years 2 pay