im abit confused about the relationship between the relative strength of an acid, and.. the number of protons that theyre able to donate..ie. whether the acid is monoprotic, diprotic or triprotic...
im confused because i thought that when there are more H ions, (or something) present within the acid molecule, this meant that it was more acidic, cept its not the case cuz.. it undergoes an equilibrium reaction, which classifies it as a weak acid (to me anyway..)
and im not sure about the degree of ionistation either, if the percentage is lower, then does this mean that its a weaker acid? [i was reading macmillian and to me it contradicts itself]
i also dont understand the statment:
" the more concentrated the weak acid, the lower its degree of ionisation"
because i thought that.. neh i dunno im confused..
help please
im confused because i thought that when there are more H ions, (or something) present within the acid molecule, this meant that it was more acidic, cept its not the case cuz.. it undergoes an equilibrium reaction, which classifies it as a weak acid (to me anyway..)
and im not sure about the degree of ionistation either, if the percentage is lower, then does this mean that its a weaker acid? [i was reading macmillian and to me it contradicts itself]
i also dont understand the statment:
" the more concentrated the weak acid, the lower its degree of ionisation"
because i thought that.. neh i dunno im confused..
help please