Whilst, although I disagree with a lot of the sentiments of WAFs post, I still see a lot of humour in it, and I am not, as you know, someone who is particularly PC. I consider myself as having an open and pretty accepting sense of humour, but i truly fail to see the humour in this comment: "The SRC acknowledges that it is meeting on Queen Elizabeth II's traditional land."
Whilst I am not up in arms at this comment, I do find it a little offencive.
Again, i reiterate that I am not radically left, I mean, I personally realise that our Prime Minister saying sorry would be seen as an admission of guilt thus open the door to ridiculous legal trials that could totally fuck the country. But I really feel that comments like that will always be insensitive and are really not necessary.
I understand that it was said in a humorous context, but I also know that there is some truth to it's sentiments.
Having said that, I come to this forum for recreation, and I really can't be bothered to become involved in some vicious argument, especially with someone who is so fanatical about such an extremist ideology as it will lead no where.
PS. I am voting for Angus because he wears D&G glaces.
Having said that, I am to a certain extent tempted to vote for a right wing SRC just because I wouldn't mind seeing what it would be like...just for the change factor really. I am also against student spending on issues that really do not affect students (eg. anti war campaigns). Also, Honi would be quite interesting...but I would miss Ramona Spanx
End stream of consciousness.
