Sport Trivia (2 Viewers)

[RyddeckerSMP]

Sort of on the right track, but it has more to do with internationals than FC.

All made their international debut before their 30th birthday.

 

[Bookie]

Non and no.

Ryddecker your still on the right track though.

 

[RanyofuKenyan?]

Youngest player ever in international debut for their respective countries?

 

[Random_87]

they all ate shit on the same day. Then they all jumped up and down for 2 hours at the same time before they all spewed after recieving food poisoning from the shit they ate.

Surely thats it!

 

[RanyofuKenyan?]

they all ate shit on the same day. Then they all jumped up and down for 2 hours at the same time before they all spewed after recieving food poisoning from the shit they ate.

Surely thats it!

A delicously vile contribution random, you could be a troll yet.

 

[RyddeckerSMP]

Just checking, Kim Barnett is the Englishman, no? Is there another Kim Barnett?

 

[Random_87]

A delicously vile contribution random, you could be a troll yet.

Hahaha, no no. Just having another shit day. the 8 hour shift killed me. Im quiting and getting a different job. But if I hate it to, maybe ill continue my 'vile' contributions.

But yes indeed, it was troll worthy

 

[Bookie]

Its a hard one, but keep thinking [and googling] you'll get it.

Its to do with ODIs, but its not performance related.

And its a pretty unique event - only acheived by those players names and a couple more.

And yes, Kim Barnett the pom.

 

[DRAGONZ]

I'll ask.

Whats the common factor between;
Andrew Zesers
Kim Barnett
Mahendra Nagamootoo
Daniel Vettori

And the answer is not "They have all played international cricket"

Tough! Question thief.

Goddamn, I got no idea.

Zesers and Nagamootoo both scored 2* on debut; Vettori scored 4; Barnett scored 84. They are all even numbers! Yes ..

Hehe I have no idea .. Barnett and Vettori both debuted in matches where THREE players were debuting .. but Nagamootoo and Zesers were the only debutants in their respective games.

Ok. I'll have one more stab at it:

They were all either NOT OUT or LAST MAN OUT for their teams in their debuts.

 

[DRAGONZ]

Shit.

NOW I read it's not performance-related, and it's got to do with their names or something.

Umm .. they all have an 'A', an 'E', and an 'N' in their names?

 

[Glenn198718]

Bookie i honestky dont think anyone is going to get this. Its a pretty hard question if you ask me. I have no idea what the answer is

 

[RanyofuKenyan?]

Who gives a shit. Bookies ones are always obscure things that aren't interesting and noone cares about. "Why is 'such and such' number significant to Australian sport?" "What do these players have in common?" there is probably several things in common/significant but Bookie has a particular one in mind. Its like asking "what did i have for breakfast today?" as a question.

 

[Glenn198718]

Who gives a shit. Bookies ones are always obscure things that aren't interesting and noone cares about. "Why is 'such and such' number significant to Australian sport?" "What do these players have in common?" there is probably several things in common/significant but Bookie has a particular one in mind. Its like asking "what did i have for breakfast today?" as a question.

LOL your probably right and it sounds like a stupid question anyway

Bookie my answer this is that they all made there test debut on the same ground

 

[LMF^^]

I agree, Bookie you should post Qz that have obviouz answerz to em, it makez the thread mo interestin that way.

 

[Constip8edSkunk]

actually i reckon those questions are more interesting than an obvious "googable" question, because it actually involves some thought process and deduction.

their original proposed debut match was abandoned/cancelled?

 

[Bookie]

The point is for it to be hard you faggots. It's ungooglable [well I guess you could, but it wouldnt be too easy]. When you post a question there is always the cocksucker like Brogan who tries Google first up and fails. Keep on guessing.

Heres an update to the question

Whats common between;

Zesers, Barnett, Vettori, Nagamootoo, Pankaj Dharmani, Mahmood Hamid, Indika de Saram

No other players have acheived this feat so far.

Remeber; ODI debuts.

 

[RanyofuKenyan?]

Excuse me, Google? My first answer was that they are all human, and its fucking correct. You won't find my answer on Google anywhere.

 

[RanyofuKenyan?]

If its ungoogleable, as you say, and so obscure that no one would know it off the top of their head, then what is the point? Anyone who gets it right will just have had a fuckin shot in the dark, coming after eliminating countless incorrect answers.

 

[shortygb]

The point is for it to be hard you faggots. It's ungooglable [well I guess you could, but it wouldnt be too easy]. When you post a question there is always the cocksucker like Brogan who tries Google first up and fails. Keep on guessing.

Heres an update to the question

Whats common between;

Zesers, Barnett, Vettori, Nagamootoo, Pankaj Dharmani, Mahmood Hamid, Indika de Saram

No other players have acheived this feat so far.

Remeber; ODI debuts.

cricket is really my thing, but maybe they all made their one day debuts for india? ( i dont know, they sound indian? )

 

[Bookie]

Not really. Cricinfo.com has a very extensive database and some clicking around there will get you the answer in no time.

And greg, I only boldened them because they were part of the new update.