I think it was like this:No clue how to do the sql problem though
SQL:
SELECT Category, Status, Count(*)
FROM Issues
WHERE Status != "Resolved"
GROUP BY Category, Status
ORDER BY Count(*) DESC;
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
I think it was like this:No clue how to do the sql problem though
SELECT Category, Status, Count(*)
FROM Issues
WHERE Status != "Resolved"
GROUP BY Category, Status
ORDER BY Count(*) DESC;
For the VPA I wrote about how it benefits as it can be trained to understand requests, thus reducing human effort. And for negative I wrote about how NN are basically black boxes so you can't 100% predict the output will be correct, wasting customer time.I'm completely fucked
I like flopped everything
What were you even supposed to write for the virtual personal assistant question?? They literally told you how NN assists ittf am I supposed to write about
And the SQL question fucked me over
And the 2d array one
And I couldn't understand what session management had to do with speed of code execution for a user
![]()
Yeah I did something similar to that. Otherwise it was fine tho.For the VPA I wrote about how it benefits as it can be trained to understand requests, thus reducing human effort. And for negative I wrote about how NN are basically black boxes so you can't 100% predict the output will be correct, wasting customer time.
I didI think it was like this:
SQL:SELECT Category, Status, Count(*) as Total FROM Issues WHERE Status != "Resolved" GROUP BY Category, Status ORDER BY Count(*) DESC;
SELECT Category, Status, Count(Status) AS Total
FROM Issues
WHERE Status != "Resolved"
GROUP BY Category, Status
ORDER BY Total DESC;
Hmm i do wonder what the marking criteria is for that question, considering its 4 marksI did
SQL:SELECT Category, Status, Count(Status) AS Total FROM Issues WHERE Status != "Resolved" GROUP BY Category, Status ORDER BY Total DESC;
Thats exactly what I wrote about for VPAsFor the VPA I wrote about how it benefits as it can be trained to understand requests, thus reducing human effort. And for negative I wrote about how NN are basically black boxes so you can't 100% predict the output will be correct, wasting customer time.
2D array python was fine, I just generated 15 pairs of coordinates and then did 2 for loops to display the grid with either spaces or Xs where they matched my coordinates
Yeah I was getting a bit worried in the exam. I spent a good 45min on that sql quesion. Youd get some marks for some SQL, maybe for WHERE , maybe for ORDER BY too but the last mark is if you use the group by correctlyHmm i do wonder what the marking criteria is for that question, considering its 4 marks
Im not sure but the data mining one I put they can use data mining on the video stream coming from the broadcast to detect corrupt and malicious data within the video stream to ultimately try and stop technical difficulties etc.flipping sql rip like 3 marks
also did not know what to write about data mining for the stupid live broadcasting thing
apart from that was okay, all the python stuff was so free
Damn, rlly?Im not sure but the data mining one I put they can use data mining on the video stream coming from the broadcast to detect corrupt and malicious data within the video stream to ultimately try and stop technical difficulties etc.
That's what i put too so i hope its rightDamn, rlly?
I wrote some stuff about how they can use the data they get to 1. see where the majority of users are located (allocation of resources etc) and 2. If a certain kind of device was always experiencing an issue
But I don't think that was right![]()
familiarisationAre we talking about the same sample exam? Marking guidelines here say its 80 https://curriculum.nsw.edu.au/file/...ngineering-sample-exam-marking-guidelines.pdf
That's what i put too so i hope its right
Sounds like pretty much any proactive analysis is data mining so we should be good.Damn, rlly?
I wrote some stuff about how they can use the data they get to 1. see where the majority of users are located (allocation of resources etc) and 2. If a certain kind of device was always experiencing an issue
But I don't think that was right![]()
Logistic is categorical probabilities so like 80% this party etc. I said yes to that.
yeah for me it was anything that was classifying smth was a yes but i dont remember exactly which ones i pickedLogistic is categorical probabilities so like 80% this party etc. I said yes to that.
