Well no shit listening to the extremists and radicals about any belief and of course you're only going to see a "war" on everything. Enjoying yoga and Japanese tea is not the same as culturally appropriating sacred holy events for your personal amusement.
If you accept that ISIS is not a good representation of Islam, the Crusaders are not the good representation of Christianity, the Myanmar Buddhist monks are not a good representation of Buddhism, then why do the radicals of SJWs and Feminists get to portray a good representation of any movement to do with equalising inequalities?
Better yet why do we get to pick and choose which radicals of SJWs we'll listen to? Martin Luther King Jr, Nelson Mandela and Emmeline Pankhurst are now champions of movements we apparently recognise and agree with yet they both promoted radical action and violence to get their messages across.
That being said the extreme SJWs of cultural appropriation today are admittedly worlds away from the above named because most are the weird heavy stupol types...