• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Simple complex number question (1 Viewer)

pikachu975

Premium Member
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
2,739
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
Why does sqrt(-6) * sqrt(-6) = sqrt(36) = 6 not work? I know the answer is = sqrt(6)i * sqrt(6)i = -6, but why does the first one not work?
 

trecex1

Active Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Messages
196
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
Probably because sqrt(x) * sqrt(y) =sqrt(xy) only works when x,y>0
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Why does sqrt(-6) * sqrt(-6) = sqrt(36) = 6 not work? I know the answer is = sqrt(6)i * sqrt(6)i = -6, but why does the first one not work?
Once we enter the complex world, the square root function is multi-valued (in fact, double-valued) (except when z = 0, in which case sqrt(z) has only one value). (Actually also for real positive numbers, it'S multivalued). We need to specify something called a "branch" to make the square root single-valued. When we use the "√" symbol, we are referring to what is known as the principal square root. For a non-zero complex number z, the principal square root √(z) is defined as √(z) = √(|z|) * cis((1/2)*Arg(z)), where |z| > 0 is the modulus of z and Arg(z) is the principal argument of z (the unique argument of z in (-pi, pi]). Here √(|z|) is the positive square root of the modulus.

Equivalently, the principal square root of z is the square root of it that has positive real part (except when z is pure imaginary, when it refers to the square root with argument pi/2).

Using this definition of principal square roots, it is not generally true that √(wz) = √(w) * √(z).

What is true is that given any two values of sqrt(wz), sqrt(w) and sqrt(z), there is a value for the third square root so that sqrt(zw) = sqrt(z)*sqrt(w).
 

Mahan1

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2016
Messages
87
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Probably because sqrt(x) * sqrt(y) =sqrt(xy) only works when x,y>0
Expanding on that idea, we can prove in a different way why is not correct.
let f(x) be our extended square root function, principal square root, where , the definition of i,. we want to prove any function with that condition can not satisfy
suppose

letting x= y implies

but we also know

from (1) and (2) we get
which is a contradiction, assuming
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top