Heya, well SGP's are due back next Friday and I have only done secondary research lol. I'm doing mine on the North West Rail Link and why they chose single deck trains instead of the existing double decker ones the rest of Sydney uses. my investigation points are that they're 1) can carry more people per hour 2) can travel at steeper gradients meaning future city stations will not need to be as far underground and 3) the harbour bridge can't carry more double deckers an hour than it already does between Milsons point and Wynyard. Minor points include that they are faster trains and also safer but the safer part seems a bit debatable seeing they have less security cameras and no staff/guards on board the train like our current ones do.
So for primary research, I've thought of conducting an interview with the North west rail link representatives. They have a community info centre I can conduct an interview with but IS THAT ENOUGH PRIMARY DATA? I've seen people doing surveys and such but if I did that as well it would be like public opinion on which they would think would have been a better choice haha.
Also is interviewing public relations people at the community info place good enough as a source or would I need to dig deeper and actually contact the transport ministers or project directors and boards that actually made the decision???
Thanks ^_^
So for primary research, I've thought of conducting an interview with the North west rail link representatives. They have a community info centre I can conduct an interview with but IS THAT ENOUGH PRIMARY DATA? I've seen people doing surveys and such but if I did that as well it would be like public opinion on which they would think would have been a better choice haha.
Also is interviewing public relations people at the community info place good enough as a source or would I need to dig deeper and actually contact the transport ministers or project directors and boards that actually made the decision???
Thanks ^_^