Is that in the course outline, I haven't gone through it yet? I guess it goes with her thing on having an annotated bibliography....although there is no annotation, it's just a normal bibliography BITCH!stazi said:furthermore, how shit is the SCLG2606 lecturer's bibliography guide. Firstly it's not an actual referencing style. She just makes up her own and says 'use it'. Secondly, she wants us to do this for books (which is ok), newspaper articles and online sources:
Smith, R., 2000, "I am a book", London, Cambridge Press
Sydney Morning Herald
1 June 2000, Spectrum Features, 'Have a Nice Riot', p.8
19 March 2008, "I am an online article" in the Age, www.theage.com.au
What the fuck. Why would you:
a) Not write the author's name (even though she says the newspaper owns the article, not the author)
b) Write the date you accessed it first, before anything else
c) Not bother with the date of publication at all. Isn't it important to look at the date, especially if someone is incorrectly using data from 100 years ago.
argh.
And who the hell italicises the newspaper of publication above the other details as a heading.
Seriously, how random of her to just make up shit. University elitism must really have gotten to her if she's just making up new means to things that already have meaning.stazi said:haha yes. in fact, the presentation is nothing like an annotated bibliography, since it would otherwise be very boring. basically we're just presenting a regular essay. and a bibliography.
this is also her idea of group work: split up themes between you. Was it her who said that we'll have to work in groups in work, which is why she's organised a group project.
Mudkip is also Ground (I think) which makes grass super-super effectiveBulbasaur said:don't make me own you again mudkip.
We call know Grass > Water
Thats usually a blessing for most of the subjects i've taken. But yes i feel your pain with the guidelines... the subjects ive taken have all said 'follow the style guide on the website' etc. No matter how close i do it to them, i always fucking lose marks for fucking it up apparently.stazi said:it's not that bad a course, it's just really badly organised. I mean, she doesn't put on a webct page, and simply emails the lecture notes out to everyone, copy-pasted into an email. Not even in a document.
No! I think it's a Sociology thing.stazi said:edit: are all arts subjects this badly organised?
stazi said:oh and to add to her list of faults: how bad is the UoS outline. Lots of spelling errors, and the percentages + due dates of assignments are all wrong. "I thought I proofread it"
edit: are all arts subjects this badly organised?
First year was SOOO much better! We had an organised co ordinator (We love you Catriona!), and a pretty little WebCT, with lecture notes AND recordings, plus a discussions section! Awesome.stazi said:it's not that bad a course, it's just really badly organised. I mean, she doesn't put on a webct page, and simply emails the lecture notes out to everyone, copy-pasted into an email. Not even in a document.
Hehe my french tutor let us go like an hour and a bit into a 2 hour tute the other day.Nebuchanezzar said:My chemistry lab today took only 45 minutes. 45! Party! Woo!
I believe that's the game to you good sir.Nebuchanezzar said:This is meant to be a four hour lab session.
hahahahhahaha that was a DVD!!!!!! She obviously hasn't heard of scene selection. I wonder if she rewinds the DVDs back to the beginning after watching?amber44 said:First year was SOOO much better! We had an organised co ordinator (We love you Catriona!), and a pretty little WebCT, with lecture notes AND recordings, plus a discussions section! Awesome.
The things Annette she sends out by email are fine for an oldie who know jack all about computers but what is she using to type these notes up in, Windows DOS, what's with all those weird symbols?
I felt sorry for her this morning trying to work the VCR/DVD player. I was going to go down and help her out but then I thought.....NAH!
She does seem like a nice person, but yeah, gotta get with the program lady, setup a WebCT page, and put lecture notes up. I mean how hard can it be, there's got to be a WebCT template out there, where all the lecture has to do is upload everything. Hey, I'll do it for you, just say YES!
Also Stas, how did you go with the agenda presentation? What did you talk about, did you just do an overview, picked a specific view...?
wow 4 hours ? and here i was , getting restless after our three hoursNebuchanezzar said:This is meant to be a four hour lab session.