Section 1 - Stimulus (1 Viewer)

[Elisa Sweet]

Text 1 was good, 2 was ok, 3 & 4 sucked! I couldn't find anywhere in text 4 where it showed inclusion, just exclusion.

 

[hjed]

Text 1 was good, 2 was ok, 3 & 4 sucked! I couldn't find anywhere in text 4 where it showed inclusion, just exclusion.

The narrator wasn't included, but the sand people included each other. I used "Everyone lives in the dunes" (inclusive language) for one of my examples.

 

[happinessisbest]

Text 1 and 2 were FINE.But Text 3 and 4? Honestly? What even was that!?
I am willing to bet that I received a maximum of 2/5 for the longer short response question - so terrible! :'(

 

[ObnoxiousTeaCup]

Sand people. Fucking text four was about sand people and sandal discrimination.

And the teachers have the nerve to call my stories shit.

 

[Spiritual Being]

Sand people. Fucking text four was about sand people and sandal discrimination.

And the teachers have the nerve to call my stories shit.

Calm down. The test was two days ago.

 

[Drifting95]

Calm down. The test was two days ago.

+1

It's over, forget it and look towards your next exams