Logain
aka Will, Skis, Willskis
I'm convinced that I fucked question 1, but 17 I believe could still possibly be B. It was difficult in any case. In any case, I'm happy with my 16-17/20 being as I finished section 1 in a grand total of 11 minutes.
Broodchuck said:Yeh thought i was really good!
I got:
1. B
2. C
3. B
4. B
5. A
6. D
7. A
8. B
9. C
10. A
11. C
12. B
13. C
14. B
15. A
16. D
17. A (how dodge, I couldn't believe they left out a word in C. ha!)
18. D
19. A
20. B
sorry my friend...RoC is return on owners equity...not net profit ratio which is np/sales x 100. RoC = np/oe x 100seadonkey said:same as u cept...
12A im 100% sure of that RoC = NP/sales x100
15D 90% sure of that
Yeh sorry mate but 12 isn't A, Return on OE = NP/OE x 100... (i think that's what the question was! I haven't got my paper here so i dont remember)seadonkey said:same as u cept...
12A im 100% sure of that RoC = NP/sales x100
15D 90% sure of that
dblanche said:Q1 I is (D) because the scientific management theory raises productivity
How can it be (B)
Exactly, a mediator cannot arbitrate, meaning that B has to be wrong.ando687 said:And i forgot to add...
Mediator arbitrates simply means a neutral third party that decides on a solution and isnt legally binding. How can a mediator pose a legally binding decision - their like counsellers (how ever tou spell it).
u forgot one more reason why its wrong, because A goes straight to the union NOT the employer to try and slove the problem. its gotta be Dando687 said:There are two reasons why A is wrong...
1. The course of action never comes to any kind of decision. There is only 'she meets her' 'he meets him' and 'they meet someone else' - there is no action being taken therefore it cant be suitable.
2. It cant be an appropriate course of action because there is no neutral third party. There is only two sides with an 'us vs them' perspective which means it is harder to come to a decision suitable for both parties.
However I could be wrong