School Ranks (1 Viewer)

[abdooooo!!!]

Originally posted by wildtiger
what school do you go to?

'asian immigrants fresh off the boat' eh, i'm slightly offended by that. anyhow, i believe otherwise - because their english usually drags them down. even if they get extremely good marks from maths, they'll have terrible marks in subjects like english or the social sciences

sorry if i offended you... its true they are geniuses... one of them guys in our school before only came to australia for a year and obtain a uai of 99.95 and 99s for both math, i think, and is now doing med at unsw.

but now there is this other dude at our school who is freakishly good at math who just came to australia 8 month ago. i wonder how good he'll be.

but im not gonna tell people about which school i go to... its too embarrasing.

 

[Numero Uno]

Originally posted by Ms 12
Well it was made up! They don't rank all schools cos this causes problems as mentioned before like parents pulling their kids out of certain schools etc.
Do you still have a copy of this, Id be really interested to see it.....

yeah i do have it still on my other computer though
im 2 lazy .. ill do it later .. like 10 mins

but i got it from amoz lilo

 

[Numero Uno]

well it been more then 10 mins

and ive spent 3 mins of my life doing this for you but anyway

here it is

 

[abdooooo!!!]

hey whats that percentage stands for? students with a band 6?

 

[MiuMiu]

Haha just one look at where they say these schools are tell you its made up (haha John Bosco in ENGADINE is put down as Strathfield-Auburn!!). Also, the spelling is appauling and there are quite a few schools missing....

 

[cro_angel]

rigion?
lol
i dont get the thing.. whats the 2nd number at the end?

 

[wildtiger]

lol somebody heaps sad must've had a lot of time in their hands....

 

[Zarathustra]

Does anybody know if the order of the top 120 schools on that list was accurate?
They must have been the SMH (or the telegraph -. whichever one that ranks the schools irrespective of the number of exams sat) rankings as they were ranked on number of exams with a mark of >90
JR comes out on top either way

 

[mic]

Originally posted by wildtiger
lol somebody heaps sad must've had a lot of time in their hands....

yep. but yeah, i can understand why a list like this wouldn't be published.

 

[Xayma]

The SMH and Telegraph use different ranking systems, the SMH uses the amount of >90 exams, while the Telegraph uses a percentage of >90 per exam sat.

 

[wildtiger]

I thought thats a bit strange coz isnt the Telegraph known for its inaccuracy in reporting events etc..? Our teacher always tells us to read SMH.

But the way the Telegraph does it seems to be more 'accurate' in the sense that they dont take into account the number of students sitting the HSC but rather the general ability of students overall.

 

[ameh]

i found the ranks of 02 off google, apparently its from a coaching college, but since numero uno was begging me to send it to him =p


yes and there's a hell of a lot of typos in it

 

[Sarah168]

the rankings that were in that attachement were very different to the ones i saw in the paper.... how was it compiled and where did it come from?

 

[Numero Uno]

Originally posted by Sarah168
the rankings that were in that attachement were very different to the ones i saw in the paper.... how was it compiled and where did it come from?

This is 2002 not 2003


And as for Amoz lilo ?
i was begging was i ?

 

[honky tonk]

Hehe my school came 192nd in 2002. I think we did better last year though.

 

[Dash]

My school was prolly around the 300 mark

 

[abdooooo!!!]

my school is not even present... umm... me thinks that is better than last year.

 

[Numero Uno]

Abdooooo!!!
wut school u goto ?

 

[abdooooo!!!]

what? you think im gonna tell you? ahaha... no way. im too embarassed by it.

 

[Numero Uno]

ok ok ok be gay