Sam 2005? (1 Viewer)

[aaaman]

Its like almost June n Trails are like two months away...got any fresh news on the progress of it???

 

[tempco]

sam 2004 does the same thing.

 

[fakingtheday]

Laz has abandonned the project. There's no need.

 

[aaaman]

Laz has abandonned the project. There's no need.

r serious? pfft doesnt surpise me since now hes finished his HSC

 

[waddle_828]

gees cut him some slack, he studying at uni
SAM was a voluntary undertaking and there isn't that much difference between 04 and 05
hes not getting paid for it so its not like your losing money over it so get over it

 

[jm1234567890]

i'd do it if I had the data.

 

[melsc]

gees cut him some slack, he studying at uni
SAM was a voluntary undertaking and there isn't that much difference between 04 and 05
hes not getting paid for it so its not like your losing money over it so get over it

RIGHT ON!

As I said in the other thread, SAM isn't vital...cut Laz some slack and he'll finish it when he is good and ready, half yearly marks wont be a good estimate of ur UAI anyway so chill out, it will be ready when its ready and enough with all the threads asking this~!

 

[Lazarus]

Laz has abandonned the project. There's no need.

Just thought I'd better reject this proposition before someone takes it too seriously.

Now that my assignments are done, I'll start working on it again tomorrow. But I have exams in just over two weeks so I can't guarantee that this means I'll be finishing it soon.

 

[aaaman]

thanks

Just thought I'd better reject this proposition before someone takes it too seriously.

Now that my assignments are done, I'll start working on it again tomorrow. But I have exams in just over two weeks so I can't guarantee that this means I'll be finishing it soon.

thank you, srry about my aggression its just stress

 

[aaaman]

gees cut him some slack, he studying at uni
SAM was a voluntary undertaking and there isn't that much difference between 04 and 05
hes not getting paid for it so its not like your losing money over it so get over it

i find it very disturbing you make assumptions on facts that you have no proof off

 

[withoutaface]

i find it very disturbing you make assumptions on facts that you have no proof off

He is actually right though. The mark SAM 2004 gives you should be accurate to within 0.5-1 point of what the new one would give you anyway (usually it'll be ~0.5-1 marks higher than what 2005 would spit out).

 

[aaaman]

He is actually right though. The mark SAM 2004 gives you should be accurate to within 0.5-1 point of what the new one would give you anyway (usually it'll be ~0.5-1 marks higher than what 2005 would spit out).

im saying i want physical proof...with the use of SAM 2005 lol

 

[fakingtheday]

SOrry i figured it would be funny.

 

[milton]

hey how come i can't get SAM 04??!!

the drop-down list only has 2001, 2002 and 2003...

 

[jm1234567890]

hey how come i can't get SAM 04??!!

the drop-down list only has 2001, 2002 and 2003...

It's Laz's damn naming convention

SAM2004 uses 01,02,03 data

JUAIseek0405 uses 02,03,04 data.

 

[hereoi]

SAM sucks

SAM is wrong.

*End communication*

 

[fleepbasding]

care to elaborate? It seems most likely that you don't understand how it operates or what it calculates.