$hiftyIceQueen said:
also how is it that Bush initiated a "just-war"? exactly how is it just?
Jus Ad Bellum (when is a war just by the criteria of Just War Theory?)
>
Just Cause: Force may be used only to correct a grave public evil (Saddam's massive violation of the basic rights of the Iraqi's and Kurds) or in defense (against the WMD's that Hussein supposedly had at the time, thus, its still a just war)
>
Right Intention: Force may be used only in a truly just cause and solely for that purpose- correcting a suffered wrong is considered a right intention
>
Probability of Success: Arms may not be used in a futile cause or in a case where disproportionate measures are required to achieve success
>
Proportionality: The overall destruction expected from the use of force must be outweighed by the good to be achieved
>
Last Resort: Force may be used only after all peaceful and viable alternatives have been seriously tried and exhausted [this is exactly what had happened. Saddamm Hussein refused to allow UN inspectors into the country]
>
Legitimate Authority: Only duly constituted public authorities may use deadly force or wage war [1. USA was legitimatly enforcing the resolutions of the United Nations and thus was a legitimate authority 2. President Bush as a sovereign ruler does count as legitimate authority]
And the Land Letter sent to President Bush by Christian leaders on October 3, 2002 stated that the Iraq invasion was a just-war...