great freedomAnd also you can talk shit about the government in China online, they just censor it.
Article 13 of the PRC Labour Law prescribes that employees or applicants for employment must not be discriminated against on the basis of nationality, race, gender, or religious belief.you could be charged under anti discrimination act because you don't want to hire a certain type of people
"Six months after the show (FCWR) first aired, officials from the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television stepped in to regulate the show."If you understand Mandarin, just watch a show called, FCWR
So they only stepped in to regulate FCWR because they insulted the Party right?In China, as long as you don't insult the Party or China itself, due to nationalist fanatics, you have the right to express your opinion without repercussions.
No successful Chinese people go on that show bro.the amount of shit ppl say on that show freely what would be deemed a career suicide if it was said in the West.
its kind of silly saying you cant be in favour of freedom of speech when you dont support anything less than an outright constituional bill of rights enshrining it.The Liberal party fucking hate free speech,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_sedition_law , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Peaceful_Pill_Handbook , etc
I don't know what the push to repeal section 18C is actually about, but I think you are a total sucker if you've been taken into thinking this is actually about free speech, the fourth estate have totally taken us on a ride over this.
My guess about why they are pushing to repeal 18C, and not the numerous other laws that are actually threatening to everyday free speech in Australia, that they've introduced and actively support, would be something like:
- dog whistle politics
- andrew bolt's celebrity status
- as a 'fuck you' to the Left for the lols, juvenile culture warrior bullshit
so I am very sceptical and don't support Brandis stupid bullshit
You need Jesus.nobody is saying you can't be offended, we're saying that just because someone gets offended by what you say doesn't mean you can't say that thing
Well the lefties needs the medicine of the "fuck you" so they lefties should get fucked, also 18c is used against Australians (eg Austrailans can't say "behead those that support islam", but however a muslim can say "behead those who insult islam")The Liberal party fucking hate free speech,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_sedition_law , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Peaceful_Pill_Handbook , etc
I don't know what the push to repeal section 18C is actually about, but I think you are a total sucker if you've been taken into thinking this is actually about free speech, the fourth estate have totally taken us on a ride over this.
My guess about why they are pushing to repeal 18C, and not the numerous other laws that are actually threatening to everyday free speech in Australia, that they've introduced and actively support, would be something like:
- dog whistle politics
- andrew bolt's celebrity status
- as a 'fuck you' to the Left for the lols, juvenile culture warrior bullshit
so I am very sceptical and don't support Brandis stupid bullshit
Good point, well madeWell the lefties needs the medicine of the "fuck you" so they lefties should get fucked
"A TEENAGE boy who screamed death threats against Christians outside a school in Sydney’s west has been charged.also 18c is used against Australians (eg Austrailans can't say "behead those that support islam", but however a muslim can say "behead those who insult islam")
That the odd times tho that revese has happened, if they really want to prove me wrong, how about the cops arrest the protesters who held up the "behead those who insult islam" signsGood point, well made
"A TEENAGE boy who screamed death threats against Christians outside a school in Sydney’s west has been charged.
The 14-year-old was in the front passenger seat of a red hatchback driven by another man when he allegedly began bellowing abuse outside the Maronite College of the Holy Family in Harris Park on September 16.
Onlookers told AAP they threatened to “kill the Christians” and slaughter their children while brandishing an Islamic State flag.
Following an investigation, the teenager was arrested by police on Tuesday.
He was later charged with intimidating a school staff member and offensive conduct.
The boy will front a children’s court on October 13."
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-...068781877?nk=d9434cf016bd0e6af5186b435b959c75
You are full of shit mate
At least 12 muslims were jailed over those riotsThat the odd times tho that revese has happened, if they really want to prove me wrong, how about the cops arrest the protesters
As far as I know there was only one person reported holding that specific sign - and she publicly apologised, explained that it was a mistake, the sign was found and picked up by her child, and she didn't know what it meant. This explanation was accepted by police and the minister for community services.who held up the "behead those who insult islam" signs
There has never been a ruling made on any section of the racial discrimination act about anything concerning Islam.18c is used against Australians (eg Austrailans can't say "behead those that support islam", but however a muslim can say "behead those who insult islam")
The point I am trying to make is that discussion with the right to offend should be constructive, not in a manner that stigmatises a vast majority of a specific population...nobody is saying you can't be offended, we're saying that just because someone gets offended by what you say doesn't mean you can't say that thing
so you don't support freedom of speechThe point I am trying to make is that discussion with the right to offend should be constructive, not in a manner that stigmatises a vast majority of a specific population...
Something that you would probably do, if you had more of a voice... the point of 18C is to stop people like you, who are completely disinterested in constructive discussion and seek to only ride a wave of outcry...
It's good law... However, it could be worded very, very differently...
You really don't like free speech do you? It's supposed to protect ALL kinds of opinions no matter how racist or bigoted you might perceive.The point I am trying to make is that discussion with the right to offend should be constructive, not in a manner that stigmatises a vast majority of a specific population...
Something that you would probably do, if you had more of a voice... the point of 18C is to stop people like you, who are completely disinterested in constructive discussion and seek to only ride a wave of outcry...
It's good law... However, it could be worded very, very differently...
What might be considered "racist" may not be racist at all... But the mentioned religion may feel that way.The point I am trying to make is that discussion with the right to offend should be constructive, not in a manner that stigmatises a vast majority of a specific population...
Something that you would probably do, if you had more of a voice... the point of 18C is to stop people like you, who are completely disinterested in constructive discussion and seek to only ride a wave of outcry...
It's good law... However, it could be worded very, very differently...
so you don't support freedom of speech
thanks for clearing that up
Free speech within reason, of course... Free speech to all, no...You really don't like free speech do you? It's supposed to protect ALL kinds of opinions no matter how racist or bigoted you might perceive.
so you don't support free speechFree speech within reason, of course... Free speech to all, no...
It's a right that is quite often hijacked by the bigots... Just being honest, that's all...
I hardly have faith in humanity and I am meant to support free speech...so you don't support free speech
I hardly have faith in humanity and I am meant to support free speech...