hey lala.
Im doin biomedical science at newcastle uni for 3 years, then i might consider doing a Master of Pharmacy after that (totalling 5 years).
I might not do pharmacy; may do pathology, medicine or research (pathology lookin good).
I wouldnt wanna do community pharmacy, because i dont want to lose track of the medical side of things and become concentrated on being a businessman in the hunt for money.
How are hospital pharmacists paid? (award?)
Whats the money like?
Is it more medically involved than retail pharmacy?
EDIT: on top of that, would a small local pharmacy employ an 18 year old as an assistant? Would i need s2/s3 or some bloody cert 2 tafe course?
Award is here:
http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/resources/jobs/conditions/awards/pdf/hsu_he_pharmacists.pdf. I'm not sure how you progress from grade to grade though but I'm sure it's not just years of experience alone--I think postgrad qualifications play a part. So as you can see, in the grad year, hosp >>>>> comm, but after that, comm >>>>>>> hosp unless you're a director of pharmacy or someone up there.
I guess by medically involved you mean do you actually have a proactive role in managing the patient's treatment, and the answer's definitely yes. There's two types of hospital pharmacists--a normal hospital pharmacist, and a clinical pharmacist. The former I feel will become more obsolete as that's the professional role the industry's pushing to have.
A normal hospital pharmacist checks technicians' work and may do some limited on-ward stuff like collecting a medication history, but otherwise will definitely not interfere in treatment. A clinical pharmacist does though--they're usually allocated a ward or two and it's their job to review new admissions and make sure everything prescribed is appropriate.
You should be fine to be employed in a pharmacy. Pharmacies are usually pretty good at specifying what kind of prior training their assistants need to have, if any. I've been employed in two pharmacies without any additional certificates. Any training they want you to have try and push for them to reimburse (or at least subsidise) the cost.
I'd also like to add that MBLG1001 in first year can be a very difficult course ! To anyone who's doing Pharmacy here, does the name Bruce Lyon ring a bell?
They have made it easier since 2009 by compiling reference material from different textbooks into the one textbook - saving you time and money
A tip: see how the first few weeks of university go before you decide to purchase any textbooks. I remember there were some textbooks that we never touched but were still told to buy!
Haha, never had to do MBLG1001 but it's better structured, the new degree. The equivalent of MBLG1001 in the old degree was a fourth year non-Honours subject (PHAR4619 Drug Development and New Drug Technologies) which was clearly a filler and an utter waste of time. That way, the Honours people don't miss out because it's got some useful stuff but taught in an utterly bad way.
+1 about the textbooks.