MedVision ad

Reasoning (1 Viewer)

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Posting this in the 2U section as it's still within the scope of the course (even though it's just my homework).



I have the graph in front of me so I can pretty much infer the answer from just that. But say I wanted to do the following question without it.



Would the following method work:


_____________________________

Another question. Is this acceptable to find the limit as x approaches 3 from above (right)

 
Last edited:

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Posting this in the 2U section as it's still within the scope of the course (even though it's just my homework).



I have the graph in front of me so I can pretty much infer the answer from just that. But say I wanted to do the following question without it.



Would the following method work:


_____________________________

Another question. Is this acceptable to find the limit as x approaches 3 from above (right)

I can't see the graph (actually, realised now it was for the function whose formula was given), but if the slope (namely [f(x) – f(3)]/(x – 3) ) approaches 2 from either side and f is continuous there (In fact, if [f(x) – f(3)]/(x – 3) approaches 2 (or some other finite number in general) from either side, then this actually implies that f is continuous there), then yes, f'(3) = 2. What you said is correct too, due to the result proved here: http://math.stackexchange.com/quest...nction-has-a-limit-must-it-agree-with-that-li.

And yes, the answer is 0 for the other limit Q.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top