^CoSMic DoRiS^^
makes the woosh noises
Also it does not work if you are already pregnant. There is another pill for that.
yes yes im aware of all this. my point, though obscured, is that regardless of the reasoning behind the morning after pill (just in case or otherwise), one who takes it is still knowingly and consciously aborting a developing human. in the case of this big moral dilemma, it would be pretty hypocritical for me to say "oh it's ok to abort the human if it's not implanted on the uterus"^CoSMic DoRiS^^ said:Yes it does, my point was that there does not even have to be a zygote for someone to take the morning after pill. People take it all the time "just in case" because they can't remember if they used protection or something.
When you're on the pill, you do not ovulate because it tricks your body into thinking its pregnant. Therefore you can't get pregnant (well actually you can but its pretty rare and usually because you did something wrong like forgetting to take it). It doesn't exactly forbid fertilisation, more like it forbids the release of an egg to be fertilised in the first place.
When you take the morning after pill there may or may not be an egg there to fertilise, but you take it anyway just in case there is (you should have some idea anyway but if you don't want to be pregnant you will take it regardless). The morning after pill does not abort an already implanted egg like darnie said, at least I am positive this is the case someone correct me if I'm wrong. You have to take it ASAP after having sex so you can get to the potential egg before it implants into the uterus.
no you are not knowingly and consciously aborting a developing human because there may not even be one there. You MIGHT be aborting a fertilised egg but there's no guarantee. People just take it because having unprotected sex tends to increase your chance of falling pregnant for some reason...Nebuchanezzar said:yes yes im aware of all this. my point, though obscured, is that regardless of the reasoning behind the morning after pill (just in case or otherwise), one who takes it is still knowingly and consciously aborting a developing human. in the case of this big moral dilemma, it would be pretty hypocritical for me to say "oh it's ok to abort the human if it's not implanted on the uterus"
I'm not really debating the fact that there's probably an ethical issue about it for some women. I just don't see it personally. In all likelihood if you're the kind of person who'd take the morning after pill you'd be the kind of person to book the abortionist if you got pregnant accidentally anyway (assuming you hadn't taken the MAP), so...y'know. I get the whole "omg you might be killing a baby" thing, I just figure it's not that big a deal if you were going to terminate any pregnancy you might have by other means anyway.Nebuchanezzar said:Sperm + egg = baby
Sperm + nothing =/= baby
Egg + nothing =/= baby
nothing + killing =/= death (contraceptive pill)
baby + killing = death (morning after pill)
hence, the point is that the normal pill does not terminate a developing life; it prevents the initiation of a life. the morning after pill terminates a developing life. NOT ALWAYS, i realise that, but that is the point to the morning after pill, and knowingly taking the risk of killing a life is the morally corrupt issue.
I think we should have mandatory abortions for the negro population. What are your thoughts?bigboyjames said:im totally pro abortion. no matter what the situation is, if the mother wants an abortion she should allowed. period.
though no1 should abort after 7 months into pregnancy.
just because one thing is surrounded by other morally corrupt actions doesn't make it any less corrupt. oh my no.^CoSMic DoRiS^^ said:Yes...and I'm saying as far as I'm concerned there's not much that's morally corrupt about using the morning after pill in comparison to other means by which you might thwart a pregnancy.
I didn't say it makes it less corrupt at all. Just that I don't see that it's any more corrupt than any other means of averting pregnancy. And I'd be inclined to say that it's less morally murky than an actual abortion (as in at a clinic with a doctor scraping it out)Nebuchanezzar said:just because one thing is surrounded by other morally corrupt actions doesn't make it any less corrupt. oh my no.
stfu stfuNebuchanezzar said:Needless murder is needless murder, rawr.
lolz define needlessNebuchanezzar said:Needless murder is needless murder, rawr.