Riet
Tomcat Pilot
hey dere, sexcipattii said:I don't care if he's a skank or not
hey dere, sexcipattii said:I don't care if he's a skank or not
Sluts, gangas and lowies get boring fast. The real fun is getting chicks to think you really love them so they put out when they normally wouldn't.Enteebee said:I'm not sure if a guy is even a player if neither of you are after a relationship, so I assumed he must be decieving you in some other way. But of course most of you aren't going to care, the fact that they're a player/womaniser/whatever means that they've worked out how to get passed whatever cares there may be... It's not like only mad hectic fully sick sluts bro get played by guys or have sex with jerks.
this isn't an 'if not x, then y' scenario.Barry_White said:I would think if someone is not appealing, then the corollary is that they are unappealing.
but awesome semantics game.
all girls are 'sluts' in their minds, never met one that isn't. We're all just clever bonobo's... though I'm sure playing out your little mind fuck seduction fantasies are nice, I believe you're just kidding yourself.Riet said:Sluts, gangas and lowies get boring fast. The real fun is getting chicks to think you really love them so they put out when they normally wouldn't.
I don't think the appeal is that they're sluts, it's that they're powerful men... if a guy can get a lot of women that means he's powerful. It's not necessarily true in reverse and for the most part men don't care about power when it comes to attractiveness anyway, for guys it's all about the physical look of the person.barry white said:From my POV, just as I don't find the allure of a slut or lowie particularly appealing, putting myself in a female's shoes I don't see the reverse as any different. Physical or otherwise.
Evilo said:you want an open relationship with someone who is already into that (and is known for it)? go for it i spose. Do what makes you happy
.ennaybur said:Bear in mind you're not looking for relationship
eh seriously, i dont understand what you're arguing against me?Ennaybur said:this isn't an 'if not x, then y' scenario.
there's someone you're going to hook up with. does having them a slut make you change your mind?
not, "hey that person's a slut"
"shit really? fuck that's hot ima go bone them now"
it means he plays the seduction game better than other guys.Enteebee said:all girls are 'sluts' in their minds, never met one that isn't. We're all just clever bonobo's... though I'm sure playing out your little mind fuck seduction fantasies are nice, I believe you're just kidding yourself.
I don't think the appeal is that they're sluts, it's that they're powerful men... if a guy can get a lot of women that means he's powerful. It's not necessarily true in reverse and for the most part men don't care about power when it comes to attractiveness anyway, for guys it's all about the physical look of the person.
and you know that's not the situation I'm talking about (lol)Barry_White said:eh seriously, i dont understand what you're arguing against me?
i say: "i don't find sluts appealing"
you say: "it's about whether they're unappealing"
i say: "'there's no real difference"
you say: "above post"
i'm saying now...and this is the best i can phrase my point: "if i knew two people who i liked/wanted to hook up with equally..and one had a reputation as a slut and the other did not...then i would choose the non-slut anyday/preference her above the slut in the heirachy of desirability"
but that's just my opinion.
agreed with what you'er saying there.Enteebee said:It's probably neutral/negative when you're just looking at the trait of 'womaniser' in isolation, but I think the personality traits that lead to someone being a womaniser lend themselves to it being a positive trait by proxy. I mean the guys I know who get the most women are all generally nice, confident blokes who are a lot of fun to be around.