Prove fx has an inverse function??? (1 Viewer)

[SammyT123]

Stuck on part D onwards.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Carrotsticks]

(d) since the function is always increasing, it must be one-to-one. Hence an inverse function exists.

(e) Try applying f to both sides.

(f) Sketch the inverse and find what region it is referring to. Play around with areas to evaluate that integral (using the original function to integrate, not the inverse).

 

[SammyT123]

(d) since the function is always increasing, it must be one-to-one. Hence an inverse function exists.

(e) Try applying f to both sides.

(f) Sketch the inverse and find what region it is referring to. Play around with areas to evaluate that integral (using the original function to integrate, not the inverse).

Thanks heeeeaaaps
All done


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk