gloria*
skin graft
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2003
- Messages
- 298
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
I think swearing is great.
I did not say that my own vocab was big at all.
I am seventeen, who wants to pretend they're NOT juvenile at this age, really?
Thanks for the loser shot. Pity Im not insulted.
You should refer to postmodernism at least once in your post if you're going to keep this up.
Come to think of it, how are you going in postmodernism? My trial was fucked. I think I failed (<--lie), Ill probably lose my rank of equal first (<-- true, and I have that rank because like you say, Im a loser and don't leave my house. because you're totally right, aren't you just?) because half way through my essay I decided I wanted to argue that postmodernism is shit and really doesn't exist.
(You would know this because you just referred to my semi-serious argument about postmodernism, claiming it was 'nonsensical'. Well. Think about it. Postmodernism is largely an antithesis of modernism, although some retard theoreticians will claim it 'embraces' modern concepts. But like all phases, it has divergent possibilities, because the way we think is determined largely by looking at/for an opposite to find the most distant possible relation to the thought or phase, or anything really. So when you think of postmodernism like that, it really doesnt exist at all, also because like we all say about theories of society and literature and everything else: you cannot define It until youre well beyond it.
So then, you have to question, what is postmodernism but a series of progressive, strictly literary movements that began when we realised that all people could write books. What more is it than a bunch of writers doing the OPPOSITE to what is expected? Fuck, its almost linear with the rise of social history, which would mean that postmodernism is not the core of anything at all.
And when you consider also that its not abstract at all (that is, without the constraint of the modernist-search-for-meaning) you begin to question whether you can even label it anywhere up near theories of society or whatever else theyre calling it now; and you wonder if you can really even label it with a post at the beginning, because what exactly are we moving past? God? No. Authority over literature? No, because a recognition if a construct does not separate you from it.
And capitalism has NOTHING to do with it, if you define postmodernism within an entirely literature-based context.)
Well anyway. Youre just as shit as me. You wasted your FIFTH post trying to make me look bad. Its annoying. Say something interesting or relevant, or just go browse the non-school forums or something.
I did not say that my own vocab was big at all.
I am seventeen, who wants to pretend they're NOT juvenile at this age, really?
Thanks for the loser shot. Pity Im not insulted.
You should refer to postmodernism at least once in your post if you're going to keep this up.
Come to think of it, how are you going in postmodernism? My trial was fucked. I think I failed (<--lie), Ill probably lose my rank of equal first (<-- true, and I have that rank because like you say, Im a loser and don't leave my house. because you're totally right, aren't you just?) because half way through my essay I decided I wanted to argue that postmodernism is shit and really doesn't exist.
(You would know this because you just referred to my semi-serious argument about postmodernism, claiming it was 'nonsensical'. Well. Think about it. Postmodernism is largely an antithesis of modernism, although some retard theoreticians will claim it 'embraces' modern concepts. But like all phases, it has divergent possibilities, because the way we think is determined largely by looking at/for an opposite to find the most distant possible relation to the thought or phase, or anything really. So when you think of postmodernism like that, it really doesnt exist at all, also because like we all say about theories of society and literature and everything else: you cannot define It until youre well beyond it.
So then, you have to question, what is postmodernism but a series of progressive, strictly literary movements that began when we realised that all people could write books. What more is it than a bunch of writers doing the OPPOSITE to what is expected? Fuck, its almost linear with the rise of social history, which would mean that postmodernism is not the core of anything at all.
And when you consider also that its not abstract at all (that is, without the constraint of the modernist-search-for-meaning) you begin to question whether you can even label it anywhere up near theories of society or whatever else theyre calling it now; and you wonder if you can really even label it with a post at the beginning, because what exactly are we moving past? God? No. Authority over literature? No, because a recognition if a construct does not separate you from it.
And capitalism has NOTHING to do with it, if you define postmodernism within an entirely literature-based context.)
Well anyway. Youre just as shit as me. You wasted your FIFTH post trying to make me look bad. Its annoying. Say something interesting or relevant, or just go browse the non-school forums or something.
