timmii
sporadic attendee
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2002
- Messages
- 928
Hmmm I'm not a good person to ask. I'm a vehement advocate against memorised essays - but thats just the way i work and not a lot of ppl agree with me. I personally just kept writing lots of practice essays in 35mins/40mins and eventually found myself getting really comfortable with the same few points and using similar terminology, but each essay was still very different.Originally posted by FadeToBlack
Another question - Say i made the improvements to my essay suggested by you, and memorised it, do you think it would have enough meat, textual detail, and flexibility to provide a good response to (most) questions they could ask?
Because at the moment i'm thinking that the question could focus on the main characters ie Deckard and John the Savage... Now if a question like that came up i could probably manage Deckard ok, but i know little of John - and this would be a problem
So if i learn and memorise a key scene or two for both Deckard and John, would this, paired with my knowledge of everything i put into my essay, provide the basis for a good response to any question they may ask?
Hehehe i loved talking about shakespeare and religion missing in BNW, so even though i didnt memorise a para on that, i just got comfortable with how i'd usually bring that into the topic etc...
I don't know about memorising scenes etc - learn the themes and a concomitant quote/scene that supports what *you* consider important in each text. What's your stance? How do you feel the "wild" manifests itself in each text? How do the characters relate to that? Definitely brush up on John, he's important as a means by which Huxley makes his point.
Read the essay i just posted to get some ideas on how to structure it?