santaslayer
Active Member
THAT was a quick response!Frigid said:there's always "ctrl +" shortcut in Firefox
I don't use firefox so I guess I'll just have to do it manually.
THAT was a quick response!Frigid said:there's always "ctrl +" shortcut in Firefox
Just so no-one gets the wrong information, that opinion is wrong.azn_spirit said:Just becoz you learnt Legal Studies 4u english and aced it in the HSC doesn't mean you will make a better law student then people that did 4u maths and 2u english, stuff learnt in HSC mean nothing in uni and i can tell you that knowing good english won't mean much, instead its rather learnt and developed over time doing countless essays and stuff. Btw theres a small number of ESL student doing Law at UTS and they've been going quite good.
Again, your lack of knowledge (with the legal profession) has the potential to mislead people. Like anything, to be successful you have to work hard. But assuming you do work hard, law is a high-earning field. It depends of course on where you choose to work, like anything. If you work for a suburban conveyancing practice sure you won't make as much. But if you work for a large firm, persistence will see you earning a good amount. It depends on many factors; not only is it oversimplifying things to say "you will/won't make money in law", but the fact is it is a high-earning field.azn_spirit said:Still good career prospects and $$$??? that is such a joke man...its hard to make lotz in Law, you have to be good and somehow stand out and thats hell difficult in law. I reckon that Law is more of a prestige thing and I doubt many people would want to go through those 5 awful years (assuming they don't appreciate law) just for the prestige.
Its a joke man...if I got 99.25 and did 4u maths and 2u english...chances is I'll do Optometry or Pharmacy or dentistry or even medicine instead of going for law that earns more money.
Lawyer's incomes are above avearge in Australia, yes, but the amount of time and effort they spend on studying and then working then raises the question of whether they should be compensated more either monetarily or, by other means. When the incomes of lawyers in Australia are compared with other countries, it is hard to say that lawyers in Australia are a 'high earning' occupation. There has been a significant brain drain of Australian and New Zealend lawyers all wanting to pursue their careers in countries like HK and England basically because of the substantial difference between what they can earn here, or overseas.MoonlightSonata said:Like anything, to be successful you have to work hard. But assuming you do work hard, law is a high-earning field. It depends of course on where you choose to work, like anything. If you work for a suburban conveyancing practice sure you won't make as much. But if you work for a large firm, persistence will see you earning a good amount. It depends on many factors; not only is it oversimplifying things to say "you will/won't make money in law", but the fact is it is a high-earning field.
Regardless of other countries, in comparison to other professions within Australia, law is a high-earning field.santaslayer said:Lawyer's incomes are above avearge in Australia, yes, but the amount of time and effort they spend on studying and then working then raises the question of whether they should be compensated more either monetarily or, by other means. When the incomes of lawyers in Australia are compared with other countries, it is hard to say that lawyers in Australia are a 'high earning' occupation. There has been a significant brain drain of Australian and New Zealend lawyers all wanting to pursue their careers in countries like HK and England basically because of the substantial difference between what they can earn here, or overseas.
melsc said:I have been for work experience, legal studies excurison and for assessments
Personally I think it depends on the case...I find family law cases boring except when I saw this lady try and read an essay she had written about what justice was (contested divorce and she was representing herself) Criminal ones are always interesting and it is not always the facts of the case...I saw the DPP have a hissy fit bcoz his evidence (which was a video tape would play)
For me its interesting but maybe I am a freak
Mock Trial cases were the funniest bcoz the law society tried to make them funny like Lymp V Bisket...a larceny case over a $5 wiggles casette...our witnesses used to make it funny as well especially in cross:
Barrister: So you served him light beer?
Witness: Yea
Barrister" Fosters?
Witness: Yes
Barrister: well fosters dont make light beer
Witness: Well I give him full strength and tell him it is light
Which one?melsc said:Thats what I tried to tell them...but since they were guys and we were gals they thought they knew more abt it than us...I think it was De La Salle
bustinjustin said:Yeah
these people piss me off
at this time of the year in yr12 there's all these randoms who suddenly want to do law just for the money/prestige
often they're the science-types who do 4u maths and only 2u of english (and hence won't necessarily appreciate law)
but they'll get kickarse uai's and get into law easily
Yeah
I was told transfer student are usually the best...coz they are the most determinedJonathan A said:Don't worry mate. I recieved a UAI below 90 and am doing law. Happy with what I am doing.
:uhhuh: I just hope I can get my act 2gether and get in first go, there other ways but it would be easierwithoutaface said:They'd most certainly be better than the 99.xxers that decided to do law because they didn't want to 'waste' their UAI.
You don't happen to go to Bethlehem Ashfield do you?melsc said:Ashfield- They were the skool of the "over-objectors"
Nah! Strathfield Girls High Schoolsantaslayer said:You don't happen to go to Bethlehem Ashfield do you?
:uhhuh: that would be coolEnlightened_One said:I reckon all the BOS members who graduate law should start their own firm.