Nebuchanezzar
Banned
Yeah so like, there's this breast cancer detection thing that a company owns (apparently), and now they're gonna assert their right to only allow breast cancer detections to be done for $2100 at their Melbourne laboratory, despite it being done all around now and presumably saving many lives.
Fair or not fair? Should we amend the laws to prevent this or not? If so how. DISCUSS! :apig:
Fair or not fair? Should we amend the laws to prevent this or not? If so how. DISCUSS! :apig:
http://www.smh.com.au/news/lifeands...st-cancer-tests/2008/10/22/1224351351118.htmlwww.smh.com.au said:WOMEN will no longer be able to go to a public hospital to find out whether they have inherited a genetic mutation that causes breast cancer, after the company that holds the licence to the gene patents set a deadline of November 6 for other laboratories to cease testing.
This would force testing for the genes - widely used by women with a family history of the disease - into Genetic Technologies Ltd's own Melbourne laboratory, at $2100 per test.
The controversial move marks the first time in Australia that a company has enforced its proprietary rights over the human body's genetic code, which some argue is inherently publicly owned. It could trigger an urgent challenge to the validity of patent laws.
The Liberal senator Bill Heffernan said yesterday the move would stifle research and increase health care costs. "The question is, do we agree with the principle of patenting and restricting research on naturally occurring genes?"
Graeme Suthers, medical adviser to the Cancer Council Australia, said the law should be revised. "As a society we have to bite that bullet," he said. "It is essential that Australian families can access testing of genes [through public hospitals]."
The genes in question - BRCA1 and BRCA2 - are implicated in up to 10 per cent of breast cancers. They confer a greatly increased risk of developing the disease, and at a younger than usual age.
The chairwoman of the Breast Cancer Action Group, Janet Green, said testing allowed women to make "an informed decision about prophylactic surgery or certain treatments," and should not depend on ability to pay.
But Michael Ohanessian, the chief executive of Genetic Technologies, insisted the change would benefit patients, guaranteeing a four-week maximum to complete a test.
"In 2005 some laboratories were averaging 11 months. Anyone in government would be hard-pressed to defend that … I believe [the laboratories] are all sub-scale and I believe there would be benefits to taxpayer funds and women's health."
He said the $2100 fee was similar to other laboratories - about 10 nationwide. He believed complaints were motivated by "a certain emotiveness when people think about patents in the field of genetics," and "an ideological objection to the private sector".
The company, which is listed on the stock exchange, licenses the genes exclusively from Myriad Genetic Laboratories in the US.
Luigi Palombi, an expert in patent law at the Australian National University, said state or federal governments could allow laboratories to continue testing under a crown-use provision in the Patents Act, but he was unaware of this ever being used.
Dr Palombi said patent law refered only to inventions, not discoveries, and he believed a federal court would find against Genetic Technologies. But the issue had never been tested, and he was not aware of a body that could afford to mount the case.
A Government spokesman said the matter was being investigated by the Australian Consumer and Competition Commission.
COUNTING THE COST
- Breast cancer affects about 13,000 Australian women a year.
- Between 5 and 10 per cent of breast cancer is linked to BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations.
- Women with a gene mutation have up to a 92 per cent risk of breast or ovarian cancer by 70, and can get cancer younger.