chomp said:
Well i for example for microphone for hearing aid "detects sound and converts it to electrical signal'
if you referred to the question (how an understanding of processes in hearing led to this) then you're fine. if not, you're proving that you understand how a hearing aid works, but you're not really answering the question.
did you say that an understanding of the hairs in the Organ of Corti and how they can be damaged and therefore need a louder sound to respond to has resulted in the development of technology to do this, then explained the hearing aid? i'm no teacher but i think you'd have to refer to that.
how much did you write for the communication question on the tympanic membrane? How much do u think we should of wrote?
also where would u find information about the tympanic membrane?
it's impossible to say how much you should have written. it depends on writing size, how concisely you wrote the answer etc i can't remember but i think i wrote about a page or just over for that one.
i wrote that you could find information in scientific journals (as these sources are generally reliable), biology textbooks, that sort of thing.