Also I don't even suck at explaning physics concepts . Apparently this 4 marker was the hardest question lmfao, I guess losers in this subject can only regurgitate bs garbage and write like shakespeare. Thankfully the marker gave me 4/4 for this
View attachment 49838
View attachment 49837
I also like how the marker ignored the fact that I said "
over the same time" (time actually was irrelevant) rather than "
over the same displacement", this goes to show the marker was bored out by the other shit verbose responses unlike mine. I really deserved a 3/4 here since I mentioned time despite mentioning displacement being correct, but the marker probably thought my response was just too good compared to most others and gave me a pity mark, since he probably spent his days giving 1/4 for this question. btw, I only went over the line by 1 line lol, I had to write further down as I crossed out work above.
Was this a good question? apparently yes, since the losers who could only rote learn, regurgitate from their ass and write like Shakespeare couldn't answer a single bit of it lmao. Not only that, I've never encountered a question like this before. All the knowledge I dumped in this question was dug out from prelim lmao and a bit of common sense. This can't be said for the majority of other quantitative HSC questions such as explaining BS such as Einstein's theory of relativity, which is purely just regurgitate what the textbook told you. Not only that, prior to the HSC exam, I didn't do jack shit studying for the bs history questions and all the other mod 7 and 8 bull crap except calculation questions lol. This qualitative is the goat in hsc physics as it actually required knowledge and some speck of intelligence.