Originally Posted by katie_tully
I don't have a problem with him being executed. Singapore have the death penalty. He broke the law in Singapore, thus he should be subject to their legal system. Those of you who have a problem with it, heed its warning.
Don't smuggle drugs over seas. Preferably, don't smuggle drugs at all!
so you are saying that morals are flexible so that whatever country you are in, then the law is what your morals should be? so the execution of homosexuals in Iran is perfectly moral because in that country homosexuality is wrong... lets all support a legal system based on where you live!
maybe you should take this quiz to sort out your morality issues
http://www.philosophersnet.com/games/taboo.htm
because clearly your moral judgement is clouded as morals are supposed to be a set of ideals that one beleives in, not easily changed points of view based on where in the world you are standing. besides, dont give me "its their laws" bullshit, execution is illegal in the world anyways
and because i have a problem with the death penalty suddenly iam a likely drug smuggler? well its not like the deterent has to be execution, simple life in prison would do the trick
perhaps Australia should make a new peice of legislation
"Any citizen of Singapore caught perchasing Australian goods in Autralia will be executed"
The people of Singapore will look on this law as fair and just, because they broke the law in our country, so they should be subject to our legal system
Infact the whole world will come to love this law.
or perhaps " If you break a law that exists in your country whilst in Australia, you will be subject to the standard punishment your homeland uses"
that way if we catch any people from Singapore for example smuggling drugs, we can execute them in revenge, but i we catch say one of our own, or an American smuggling drugs we can let them off liightly because they are either our citizens, or a country with our ideals in mind.