• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

need help with projectile motion (1 Viewer)

jemsta

I sit here alone
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
5,711
Location
O.P
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
if someone can help it wouldbe greatly appreciated
an object is projected vertically upqards with a speed of 49m/s. 2 seconds later another object is projected vertically upwards from the same spot at the same speed. find when and where the two objects meet
 

Dreamerish*~

Love Addict - Nakashima
Joined
Jan 16, 2005
Messages
3,705
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Are the angles given?

So far I've worked out that the displacement equations are:

x1 = 49tcosθ

y1 = 49tsinθ - 5t2

Since the next projectile is basically exactly the same as the first one, only it's projected 2 seconds later:

x2 = 49(t + 2)θ

y2 = 49(t + 2)θ - 5(t + 2)2

When they meet, x1 = x2 and y1 = y2.

I just can't work it out. If their angles are the same and their initial velocity are the same, and they are subjected to the same forces, then they just don't meet at all.
 

Antwan23q

God
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
294
Location
bally
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
yeh, use the formulars
so for the first one, y=49tsin@-1/2gt^2
but for the second one,
y=Vsin@(t-2)-1/2g(t-2)^2

because it is projected 2 seconds after, the time has to be t-2. hope it helps
 

Dreamerish*~

Love Addict - Nakashima
Joined
Jan 16, 2005
Messages
3,705
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
azn_gangsta81 said:
nar there are no angles involved....must have some other way
Hmm, well I'm thinking no way can the angles be the same when the velocities are the same.

I have a brilliant idea! Let's wait for someone else to answer it. :)
 

Antwan23q

God
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
294
Location
bally
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
its been projected vertically upwards so it has no horizontal motion
 

lucifel

narcissitic angel
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Messages
83
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2005
vertically upwards = angle = 90, work it out from there on in
 

jemsta

I sit here alone
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
5,711
Location
O.P
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
nar there are no angles involved....must have some other way
 

Dreamerish*~

Love Addict - Nakashima
Joined
Jan 16, 2005
Messages
3,705
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
antwan2bu said:
t-2 people
Isn't it (t + 2) for the second projectile?

Because it's at the same spot as the first projectile two seconds later, hence adding two seconds to t?
 

Antwan23q

God
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
294
Location
bally
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
Dreamerish*~ said:
Isn't it (t + 2) for the second projectile?

Because it's at the same spot as the first projectile two seconds later, hence adding two seconds to t?
nah, set t=0, it will say it is positioned 2 seconds ahead then. so u have to callibrate it, so when it has passed 2 seconds, it will be at the start. if u get me
 

Dreamerish*~

Love Addict - Nakashima
Joined
Jan 16, 2005
Messages
3,705
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Lol, I managed to get t = 1 which is totally impossible because at t = 1, the second projectile hasn't even been fired yet.
 

SaHbEeWaH

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
42
it's being fired vertically up so there are no angles involved

projectile 1: consider vertical motion

a = -10
v = -10t + c
at t = 0, v = 49, so c = 49
v = -10t + 49
y = -5t^2 + 49t

projectile 2: consider vertical motion

a = -10
v = -10t + c
at t = 2, v = 49
49 = -20 + c
c = 69
v = -10t + 69
y = -5t^2 + 69t + c
when t = 2, y = 0
0 = -20 + 138 + c
c = -118
y = -5t^2 + 69t - 118

-5t^2 + 69t - 118 = -5t^2 + 49t
29t = 118
t = 4.07 seconds

EDIT: i can't subtract

-5t^2 + 69t - 118 = -5t^2 + 49t
20t = 118
t = 5.9 seconds
 
Last edited:

Ghost1788

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
276
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
does any one know the answer....the right answer cause i got t=3.37 which isnt what ^^^ got so um yea...i did my calculations seperately
 

jemsta

I sit here alone
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
5,711
Location
O.P
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
did you assume that g=9.8 or -9.8? coz i put 9.8 and it works but if you put -9.8 u get a negative. i got the answer which was 6 seconds and meets at 117.6metres, but if you do get a negative answer do u assume that t=6 since t >0?
 

SaHbEeWaH

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
42
I assumed it -10m/s^2

If you assume g = 9.8 then in theory throwing the projectile up will never fall down and since the ball is always accelerating up at a faster rate than the second you shouldn't even get an answer...

Velocity is a vector quantity and since gravity pulls objects down into earth hence the - sign

If you get a negative value of t don't just assume you're right and take the absolute value since t > 0... you should'nt ever get a negative value for t...
 

acmilan

I'll stab ya
Joined
May 24, 2004
Messages
3,989
Location
Jumanji
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
You can take g = +9.8, you just have to switch the signs for anything going upwards. Both ways work.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top