• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

MX2 Integration Marathon (1 Viewer)

stupid_girl

Active Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
221
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
This question can take ages if you're not on the right track.:mad:

(modified to make it look more evil😈...feel free to share your attempt)
It seems no one has attempted yet. It's actually a combination of several results. The last one is the most interesting.😈
















 

stupid_girl

Active Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
221
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Last question of the year

Show by mathematical induction that

for all positive integers n and non-zero real number a.
 
Last edited:

Drdusk

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 24, 2017
Messages
2,022
Location
a VM
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
Uni Grad
2023
Last question of the year

Show by mathematical induction that

for all positive integers n and non-zero real number a.
I got this one, it's quite a standard one especially compared to all the other ones.
 

fan96

617 pages
Joined
May 25, 2017
Messages
543
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
Uni Grad
2024
How about something a little bit different?



Without numerically evaluating , show that




The well known inequality may be useful.
 
Last edited:

Drdusk

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 24, 2017
Messages
2,022
Location
a VM
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
Uni Grad
2023
How about something a little bit different?



Without numerically evaluating , show that




The well known inequality may be useful.










 

stupid_girl

Active Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
221
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
This one should be harder.
I think I've masked the underlying substitution quite well.:cool:
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Anyone has guessed the substitution?
I can reduce it but I can't evaluate it. Are you sure this integral is expressible in terms of elementary functions?

The numerical integration returns 0.4690815321272337326612091235046416327076, which has no simple form in the Inverse Symbolic Calculator.
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Once the substitution is uncovered, it is not much fun.

tried this as my initial thought (i knew getting rid of the denominator was a necessary step), didn't get very far for some reason, maybe i made an arithmetical error somewhere
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top