more raw and scaling (1 Viewer)

[flyin']

2001 has much better scaling for Ext2. Well, they did well in their Ext1, unlike those in 2002 (which I was part of).

 

[freaking_out]

Originally posted by flyin'
2001 has much better scaling for Ext2. Well, they did well in their Ext1, unlike those in 2002 (which I was part of).

yeah but also the fact that 2001 paper was way harder than 2002.

 

[Dash]

I seriously hope a mark in the mid 60s will get at least an aligned mark in the high 80s

 

[freaking_out]

Originally posted by Dash
I seriously hope a mark in the mid 60s will get at least an aligned mark in the high 80s

yeah, i'm hoping it to b 90s.

 

[Lazarus]

Originally posted by ND
Then why wouldn't someone who would get 90 in adv just do standard, top the state, and get a scaled mark of like 98?

Standard and Advanced are scaled in the same way. A student with a scaled mark of 98 in Standard would have had the same raw mark as a student with a scaled mark of 98 in Advanced. Their aligned marks would have been different, however.

 

[freaking_out]

Originally posted by Lazarus
Standard and Advanced are scaled in the same way. A student with a scaled mark of 98 in Standard would have had the same raw mark as a student with a scaled mark of 98 in Advanced. Their aligned marks would have been different, however.

yeah, and my teacher said the problem with standard is that not much kids in the state get above 80, so ur betta off doin' standard.