• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Michelson-Morley Experiment (1 Viewer)

irvine

USYD 2011 :D
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
420
Location
Canteen
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
I'm looking at the syllabus and trying to write notes on the couple of dotpoints on the MM experiment, but i'm unsure of the depth we actually need to go into.

Does anyone know how broad we need to be? Thanks.
 

annabackwards

<3 Prophet 9
Joined
Jun 14, 2008
Messages
4,670
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
Enough for a 4 marker at least, no more than what i needed for a 7 marker :)
 

darkchild69

Nanotechnologist
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
235
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2001
I'm looking at the syllabus and trying to write notes on the couple of dotpoints on the MM experiment, but i'm unsure of the depth we actually need to go into.

Does anyone know how broad we need to be? Thanks.
- Description of what the experiment intended to find out
- Description of the experiment itself
- Description of results
- Analysis of what these results meant
- Discussion on how these results changed scientific thinking

I reckon that would be pretty decent
 

LOL™

I invented "lol"
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
90
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2010
Know how to draw the diagram as well for the Michelson-Morley Experiment because it is much more clear than a description of how it is set up.
 

madsam

God among men
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
250
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
You shouldn't have to write more than a 4-5 mark answer for it, but you need to know a few points as to what it meant (and then choose the relevant points when answering the question)

Why the experiment was designed
What it set out to accomplish
The set up of the prac (ie diagram)
The results of the prac
The effect of a null result on scientific thinking
The effect of the experiment upon society and technological advance
 
Joined
Dec 24, 2009
Messages
30
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
The main points you need to know are as follows:

– Aim: To measure the existence of an aether wind which caused the speed of light to vary.
– Equipment: Interferometer mounted on a large stone block floating on mercury so it could be rotated to repeat the experiment in different directions.
– Method: Involved two beams of light and an interferometer to establish a diffraction pattern.
– Hypothesis: Interferences patterns would be observed.
– Results: Null.
– Conclusion: None.
– Impact on science: Many scientists accepted the result as proof of non-existence of aether. Others regarded experiment as failure due to imprecise equipment.

And being familiar with the apparatus would be useful which can be found in most Physics textbooks.
 

irvine

USYD 2011 :D
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
420
Location
Canteen
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Thankyou very much for the help :)

As for the "competing theories" dot point, do we only need to talk about aether theory vs. Special relativity or lorenzt's hypothesis (length contraction) vs. Special relativity?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top