Maths Extension 2 Predictions/Thoughts (2 Viewers)

[kkk579]

de

guys i think i got in the thirty's for this test has my atar been completely destroyed, on 10units btw

pends on ur aim

 

[tsswhzl]

i wanted above 90, not for any real reason because im already in for uni

 

[kkk579]

i wanted above 90, not for any real reason because im already in for uni

i tthink 30 smth aligns to like 60 smth but 4u scales pretty well so if u do well in ur other subjects u might be able to get 90 atar

 

[kkk579]

i tthink 30 smth aligns to like 60 smth but 4u scales pretty well so if u do well in ur other subjects u might be able to get 90 atar

cos i think a 60 in 4u is like equivalent to a 96/97 in adv

 

[tsswhzl]

i tthink 30 smth aligns to like 60 smth but 4u scales pretty well so if u do well in ur other subjects u might be able to get 90 atar

So does my score get aligned to ~60 then get scaled or is that it

 

[kkk579]

So does my score get aligned to ~60 then get scaled or is that it

gets aligned then scaled im pre sure @jimmysmith560 would probably know more abt this stuff

 

[AAArated]

i wanted above 90, not for any real reason because im already in for uni

so it doesnt matter go sleep play some games Idek why ur studying

 

[bigbird102]

yea im screwed lol i think i did worse than trials... now time to pray for e1 but idk

i think im most curious about how scaling will be this yr. some says its gonna be like 2024 (which was prtty bad scaling). some say 2021. some say 2021 or 23. idek at this point.

 

[coolcat6778]

i think im most curious about how scaling will be this yr. some says its gonna be like 2024 (which was prtty bad scaling). some say 2021. some say 2021 or 23. idek at this point.

well at the lower end the alignment will probably be the same as 2023 if not better. The E3 cut off mark is unrelated to the E4 cut off mark

 

[samdaman33]

goon before the exam trust it's meta

i - i think you'll get an e4

 

[kkk579]

wait guys for this q i think i accidentally wrote n for the denominator on the rhs of the inequality instead of 2n fhen i used backwatds reasoning is this still at least 1 mark or what

 

[kkk579]

wait guys for this q i think i accidentally wrote n for the denominator on the rhs of the inequality instead of 2n fhen i used backwatds reasoning is this still at least 1 mark or whatView attachment 49992

I think i also made an algebra mistake while expanding but at the end when i simplified and moced it all over to one side i had to prove it was > 0 and let f(n) be that function, diffed it and showed that it was increasing for n>0 and also did f(0) and showed that this was >0 and thus the end inequality was true meaning that the original inewuality must be ttue

 

[KanyeEast69420]

yall wht do u think raw 98 will scale to

 

[coolcat6778]

yall wht do u think raw 98 will scale to

scaled mark of 50/50 equivalent to 99.95 ATAR performance

Fun fact: It's not strategic to dedicate too much time to MX2, since MX2 scales well anyway. Any raw mark above 70 is pretty much useless in the grand scheme of things. Obviously I don't come close to that mark, but I think if you get like a 98, UAC should award you by giving you 10 extra scaled marks. so a 50/50 should turn into a 60/50 to keep things fair for the high achievers.