Maths Ext 2 Predictions (2 Viewers)

[Hejjwheh23]

nope i believe thats under induction. View attachment 44975
it probably falls under this one but idk im not a syllabus slave never looked at this thing before tbh

Alright, imma just have to hope it doesn't show up.

 

[kendricklamarlover101]

Alright, imma just have to hope it doesn't show up.

prepare for the worst and hope for the best

 

[C2H6O]

The last few years have had complex numbers, proofs and mechanics for question 16c, wonder if it'll be vectors this year?

 

[twinkiecat]

OOPS ignore the last message sent by accident

 

[femboys4life]

The last few years have had complex numbers, proofs and mechanics for question 16c, wonder if it'll be vectors this year?

got anything in mind?

 

[Dontcallmedude]

Hoping for mechanics or integration for question 16. Proof would make me a very sad boy

 

[twinkiecat]

Is not doing question 16 a conceivable strategy

 

[C2H6O]

Is not doing question 16 a conceivable strategy

i think so if you can make sure you drop almost no marks in questions 11-15, so that if you flunk multi choice and 16 you can still have the possibility of a score of 70-75 and an E4

 

[epicmaths]

I'm gonna offer an alternative angle - given the syllabus revision coming up in 2026 - NESA is realising the lack of clarity in the original syllabus and will play by the books this year and until the new syllabus is released - meaning they will stick to tried and true questions, or am I coping hard?

 

[Trebla]

Is not doing question 16 a conceivable strategy

Actually, there are often parts in Q16 that are easy marks. For example, suppose a question has two parts where part (i) is a hard proof but part (ii) is hence deduce this using part (i). In many cases, part (ii) is quite easy so you can just skip straight to that to get some free marks.

Also, it would be a bad idea to skip any induction questions completely, unless you are unable to prove the base case to squeeze at least one mark out of it.

 

[user1207]

Is not doing question 16 a conceivable strategy

LITERALLY what i was thinking for nearly every paper i've done so far omg

 

[user1207]

Hoping for mechanics or integration for question 16. Proof would make me a very sad boy

same, at least with those i know where to start proofs can sometimes be the most whack shit i've ever seen

 

[ringading]

same, at least with those i know where to start prrofs can sometimes be the most whack shit i've ever seen

no for real especially the ones with so much inequalities and stupid sigmas

 

[ringading]

LITERALLY what i was thinking for nearly every paper i've done so far omg

every practice paper I've done, I've always skipped q16 its just not doable rn.

 

[ringading]

itd be such a flex though to do all of q16

those insane people who get basically 100 in ext 2

 

[femboys4life]

q16 lowkey easier than q14 maybe 15 those r the hardest

 

[kendricklamarlover101]

I'm gonna offer an alternative angle - given the syllabus revision coming up in 2026 - NESA is realising the lack of clarity in the original syllabus and will play by the books this year and until the new syllabus is released - meaning they will stick to tried and true questions, or am I coping hard?

are you going to be streaming your reaction to the test again this year?

 

[Armon]

Honestly I don't see vector planes, I'm not sure if they're explicitly in syllabus?

Fizzysoda emailed a few years back to clarify. Planes, Octets, Cross Product are all OOS.

 

[femboys4life]

Fizzysoda emailed a few years back to clarify. Planes, Octets, Cross Product are all OOS.

what are octets

 

[Armon]

what are octets

sorry, octants.