thenothing
no member
This only goes for English based subjects, such as the obvious (English Standard, Advanced, and Extensions), Histories, Studies of Religion, etc.
Now that the HSC is over, and results are out, I, like many people have been doing a lot of reflection. Does anyone feel that sometimes they were marked not for their merit in assessments, but rather for who they were? ie, a teacher gets an impression that some students are smarter than others, and marks them accordingly.
I can see in some of my subjects my rank has affected my mark in a big way, for example, 37 for assessment in Extension 1 English, and 45 in the HSC. Same thing happened in History Extension. Same level of studying if that's what you're thinking
Now that the HSC is over, and results are out, I, like many people have been doing a lot of reflection. Does anyone feel that sometimes they were marked not for their merit in assessments, but rather for who they were? ie, a teacher gets an impression that some students are smarter than others, and marks them accordingly.
I can see in some of my subjects my rank has affected my mark in a big way, for example, 37 for assessment in Extension 1 English, and 45 in the HSC. Same thing happened in History Extension. Same level of studying if that's what you're thinking