• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Juliar betrays australia, destroys our economic future (1 Viewer)

cheese_cheese

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
403
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
people whose parents left them with like inheritance money or property will get taxed on it, and the money will be used for redistribution purposes in order ot create a more equal society..
their basis being the fact that its not fair that some babies are born into the world rich and others poor.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nat...urrect-death-tax/story-fn59niix-1225917708955
not as strict as they had planned initially...placed a higher cap amount or something now.
That seems pretty reasonable to me to be honest.
 

cheese_cheese

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
403
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
i cant really say that i approve of fascism more than i approve of labor style socialism sorry bro you are the greater of two evils
(probably just bendeguz fucking with us)
Gillard is not perfect, although I would rather live under Gillard than a fascist Hitler esque prime dictator. Gillard hasn't killed millions of people.
 

cheese_cheese

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
403
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
i legitimately mean that bob brown is a closet-communist. all of his economic policies = wealth redistribution. he is only one step short of saying everyone should earn the same amount for a days work.
It is not wealth distribution at all, it is simply leveling the playing field slightly and reducing the gap between the 99% and the 1%. of course people should still be paid differently.

Although why should a CEO get millions of dollars while hsi workers make 50K a year etc? One example of a great CEO is the CEO of Japan Airlines (one of the largest airlines in the world). His CEO is 90K USD a year (he took a huge pay cut as the airline was in trouble and he thought if his workers had to suffer so should he). That is reasonable.
 

cheese_cheese

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
403
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
>the free market can fix ANYTHING
>put a simple price on negative externalities
>THE FREE MARKET IS RUINED! COMMUNISM!
The 'free market' failed miserably when it bought on the 2008 - present global economic crisis. The worst economic crisis since the Great Depression of 1929. The free market theory should have been thoroughly abandoned by now.
 

muhahahahahaha

Active Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
1,781
Location
Mars
Gender
Female
HSC
2010
That seems pretty reasonable to me to be honest.
so you think its fair that hardworking people should get taxed on the money and//or property that they allow their children to inherit?
is it justified that we tax people for dying?
dont forget that the income that they made was already taxed and the same with the property that they purchased, they were taxed on that too..
so we are taxing what has already been taxed..hmmm sounds fair to me.
 
Last edited:

funkshen

dvds didnt exist in 1991
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
2,137
Location
butt
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
typical australian political practices include skolling yard glasses at record speed
 

cheese_cheese

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
403
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
so you think its fair that hardworking people should get taxed on the money and//or property that they allow their children to inherit?
is it justified to get taxed for dying?
dont forget that the income that they made was already taxed and the same with the property that they purchased, they were taxed on that too..
so we are taxing what has already been taxed..hmmm sounds fair to me.
Double taxation is actually quite common in many countries (where both companies are taxed and then individuals that own the companies and that encash money from their company are then charged personal income tax on top again). Of course, not all estates should be taxed, certainly not. Any estate > say three million dollars (adjusted for yearly inflation) should see a 5% death tax of it payable to the government when the tangible assets are converted to cash. I.e. if you live in an inherited home, you don't pay the death tax until the home is sold. If you choose to sell the home then you would pay the death tax immediately from the proceeds of the sale. This seems very reasonable.
 

Chemical Ali

지금은 소녀시대
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
1,728
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Upgrade your BoS Experience today... increase the quality of NCAP posts by over 200%. It's easy!
how, you ask?

It's simple!

This message is hidden because cheese_cheese is on your ignore list.
 

muhahahahahaha

Active Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
1,781
Location
Mars
Gender
Female
HSC
2010
In the interest of my sanity and the sanity of others on this board:
STFU.
lmao..like the AFP even searches the BoS forums lol. Cheese cheese a lot of things are illegal but people still do it...so i say, who gives a fuck if pretending to conspire against browny is illegal.
 

Chemical Ali

지금은 소녀시대
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
1,728
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
lmao..like the AFP even searches the BoS forums lol. Cheese cheese a lot of things are illegal but people still do it...so i say, who gives a fuck if pretending to conspire against browny is illegal.
I'm pretty sure ASIO give NCAP a glance every now and then after the great antisemitism incident of oh-nine (or was it oh-eight? iuno)
 

Azure

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
5,681
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Double taxation is actually quite common in many countries (where both companies are taxed and then individuals that own the companies and that encash money from their company are then charged personal income tax on top again). Of course, not all estates should be taxed, certainly not. Any estate > say three million dollars (adjusted for yearly inflation) should see a 5% death tax of it payable to the government when the tangible assets are converted to cash. I.e. if you live in an inherited home, you don't pay the death tax until the home is sold. If you choose to sell the home then you would pay the death tax immediately from the proceeds of the sale. This seems very reasonable.
Murder is also quite common in many countries. The whole argument is unreasonable.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top