He's inThis is not accurate at all
I agreeThis is not accurate at all
I copped it on drop daycan we take a moment to appreciate how beautiful the new edition calculators are?
View attachment 30642
one problem tho - 100 and 82 look the exact same nowI copped it on drop day
well technically that's an approximation of pi, but the picture jimmy posted is orders of magnitude less accurateCasio FX-100AU Plus Scientific Calculator 2nd Edition: π = 3.14159265359
SylviaB: Actually that's factually wrong
...17 palestinian CHILDREN killed in one fucking week.Know their names: Palestinian children killed by Israeli forces
Israeli forces have killed more than 3,000 Palestinian children over the past 20 years.interactive.aljazeera.com
You're against immigration? That's pretty cringe and racist broGiven the years in the details to the question (1920-1948), yes, Britain can be held responsible for many reasons, including:
- The Balfour Declaration, which Britain had no business declaring; "Balfour Declaration" on @Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration
- Gross ( and probably deliberate ) failure in allowing massive European immigration into Palestine;
- Gross (and probably deliberate) failure in allowing these Europeans to smuggle massive amounts of arms;
- Gross and deliberately duplicitous negotiations with Palestinians, where Britain had no intention of honoring any of the agreements reached;
- Gross and deliberate equivocation in negotiations, allowing enough time to pass to enable the European settlers to prepare and to strategize and execute their long standing aim of cleansing Palestine through terror and war.
It is thoughThis is not accurate at all
He was joking, which triggered my reply:It is though
I agree
Mate there have been authorities proving this number. What justification is there for the murder of innocent children? The point is, if there’s 100, 17, or 1, there shouldn’t even be one in the first place.
Oh I seeHe was joking, which triggered my reply:
I’m guessing this is your first encounter with SylviaB.Mate there have been authorities proving this number. What justification is there for the murder of innocent children? The point is, if there’s 100, 17, or 1, there shouldn’t even be one in the first place.
Haha nope, I’ve seen him before on a couple of threads, but I just can’t figure out when he’s serious or notI’m guessing this is your first encounter with SylviaB.