katie tully
ashleey luvs roosters
omg so cuteSquirtle. said:Should i go to the Middle East and Hydro-Pump everybody??
omg so cuteSquirtle. said:Should i go to the Middle East and Hydro-Pump everybody??
Yeah, but nobody with half a brain believes anything that comes out of the mouths of the Egyptian leadership. It's a dictatorship that runs faux elections with the same clown in power for decades.John Oliver said:Dude the Egyptians went on the record saying most of the discord in the area was caused by Iranian intervention. That is absolutely huge.
More propoganda. The Palestinians have attempted on many occasions to work out a settlement with Israel showing that the mentality of the past where they would not accept any Israeli state has gone. Morally should they have accepted such a state? Well according to the first Israeli Prime Minister, Hell no they shouldn't. But Israel is the state who is defying international law and attempting to drive the Palestinians into the sea. Not vice versa. The continued claims that "so and so" wants to wipe Israel off the map is a propoganda line and has been disproven countless times.Palestinians, aimed to finally break their exhausted, bizarre and hateful struggle to unconditionally 'drive the Zionists into the sea'.
lol.John Oliver said:After the local Palestinians began shipping off the Jews who escaped from the Nazis, back to the Nazis, by the thousands.
Finally, i didn't think you'd say that.John Oliver said:Moment of Honesty: 600+ dead civilians is a travesty, and it shows how utterly outdated and ineffectual the Israeli military tactics are. It also consolidates the notion that the Israelis really don't care for the Palestinians at all.
Whilst I feel it undermines and excoriates Israel's tactics, I do not feel it has any impact on their mandate to protect and secure their borders and their people.
The use of the word returned here is very loose at best. Whilst they returned the land in one sense, they continued to blockade it and dominate it militarily, denying them decent living conditions, which is functionally the same as occupying it.John Oliver said:They used to occupy Gaza and they returned it.
They returned gaza and look how well that worked out for them.
Egypt is scared of Israel.John Oliver said:Dude the Egyptians went on the record saying most of the discord in the area was caused by Iranian intervention. That is absolutely huge.
Not before Egypt had a buildup of like 100,000 troops on Israel's doorstep.Exphate said:All good ey, except for the fact the Israelis openned the conflict with air raids that raped the air force of the Egyptians.
lol arabs were just joking, sif they'd invade Israel!Exphate said:Buildup = attack?
.John Oliver said:I'll accept BBC not CNN you moron.
What of the continually growing number of illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank? I would suggest that was a large part of SIQ's point, also, their continued occupation of Arab lands given by that UN group.John Oliver said:They used to occupy Gaza and they returned it.
Welcome to colonialism. Do we return all lands to their indigenous owners? The Ottoman empire collapsed, to the victors go the spoils, basically.
The UN can't give NZ to Australia because they aren't an occupying colonialist power. Were the NZ government in a complete state of collapse and NZ in a state of Anarchy, I'm sure Australia would annex NZ.
Concerning all this, I do still believe that the creation of Israel was a dastardly act and had no, eh, justification. But it's in the past, is my view, and as it stands we've got a bunch of violent Jews living next to a bunch of violent Arabs. Never mind what happened then, everyone should try to make the best of what is there now. Concessions by both sides, my friends!Those are vastly different situations. Whilst there had been quite a lot of Jewish emigration to then Palestine, the creation of Israel was after the absolute horrors of the Holocaust, and to provide the Jews with a protection that such an atrocity would never happen again.
stfu Jew. Don't paint the return of Gaza as anything approaching a positive thing. They withdrew their forces but locked off the country to trade, starved it of food, water and power, and continue to control its air and naval space. Now that their half assed "return" of Gaza led to them being attacked by a bunch of pissed off Arabs (rightfully so), they've begun occupying it again. ISRAEL NEEDS TO MAKE ACTUAL CONCESSIONS. THIS MEANS MORE THAN GAZA.They returned gaza and look how well that worked out for them.
Eh, Hamas was democratically elected by the Gazans. Israel has to work with them. This campaign is going to increase their numbers and support, much like what happened with Hezbollah. Peace means working with the Palestinians, and not just the ones that Israel believes are happy chaps.Peace is a secular state being established by fatah in partnership with Israel. Between what Sam's pointed out in regards to the foundation of Hamas and how right wing the Knesset is getting, I don't think this is happening any time soon.
The point of this, and my regular links to the Israeli press, being that Israel is far from the peaceful bringer of democracy and freedom in the Mid East that you and your band of Jews make it out to be.Completely unnecessary, I could show you 400x more photos of Islamic extremists committing atrocities. Make the argument on facts or don't make it at all, emotion clouds judgement and causes such atrocities to occur.
Looked like a carpet/cluster bomb type thing to me. In any case, it doesn't look terribly accurate.jb_nc said:Page 8 of the Hearld has a photograph of Israel dropping white phosphorus over a built-up area, perhaps even a child's playground.
Gaza 'war crimes' warning - World - smh.com.ausmh said:The UN human rights chief warned a special session of the Human Rights Council on Friday that human rights violations in Gaza and some reported incidents there might warrant prosecutions for war crimes.
"The vicious cycle of provocation and retribution must be brought to an end," Navi Pillay told the council, which was holding a special session on human rights violations in the Palestinian territory.
"Accountability must be ensured for violations of international law," she said, calling for "credible, independent and transparent investigations" as a first step.
"I remind this council that violations of international humanitarian law may constitute war crimes for which individual criminal responsibility may be invoked," she added.
But the council meeting ended without agreement on a resolution after failure to agree on the term of a condemnation of human rights abuses since the Israeli intervention in Gaza.
The session is expected to decide on Monday whether or not to adopt a draft resolution tabled by Cuba, Egypt and Pakistan.
The text seeks the 47-member council's condemnation of the Israeli offensive and of the "grave human rights situation" in Gaza.
The draft resolution tabled late Friday underlined the civilian toll, especially in Gaza, and called for "the immediate cessation of Israeli military attacks" as well as an "end to the launching of crude rockets against Israeli civilians" in a concession to the European Union.
It also demanded that Israel "stop the targeting of civilians and medical facilities and staff" and that border crossings be reopened.
However the council remains deeply split and there was doubt whether an agreed text could emerge by Monday night. Some western countries see the draft as one-sided and said the resolution should condemn human rights violations by both sides and not simply call for a ceasefire.
Pillay called for an independent investigation of the violence, stressing that Israel and Palestinian militants had an obligation under international humanitarian law to care for the wounded, and to protect ambulances, hospitals, health workers, schools, civilians as well as their homes.
The High Commissioner underscored calls for a ceasefire, warning that rocket attacks from the Gaza Strip on Israel and "retaliatory" air strikes by Israel forces were "unacceptable."
"The situation is intolerable," she said, warning that the overall conditions for civilians "constitute egregious violations of human rights."
But Pillay went further, enumerating more evidence of violations of international humanitarian law from the UN agencies and the International Committee of the Red Cross, after civilians and relief workers were killed or wounded during Israeli attacks.
The meeting comes on the heels of the UN Security Council's near unanimous approval on Thursday of a resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire and the unimpeded provision throughout Gaza of humanitarian assistance.
However, Hamas later rejected that resolution, and Israel followed by rejecting a ceasefire.