this is why i hate the people that write the syllabus...but its good it provides modern history with a bit of lateral thinking...no pun intended
okaii...basicalli wat you got to do is think that the consequences are not really consequnces you my friend HAVE TO MAKE THE LINK... stuff lyk how the refugees had to flee, how bhuddist's got perscuted, how diems strategic hamlet alienated people, how ...and this is the best one and will get you the best mark..."HOW THE INDECIVENESS OF THE GENEVA AGREEMENT, I.E. INEEFECTIVENESS OF THE COMMISION...lol indians btw, how they basicalli did not make the free election occur, which divided the country further...and concereted the lines between north and south...note: that the consequnce of geneva for america was that it was forced to suppourt Diem because he inherited the south and was the only viable leader i.e. anti communist. therefore basicalli up until 64 it led to us providing advisors which further promoted tensions between them and the norths nationalism...i think they choose 64 cause thats wen presidents change.....i.e. kennedys assasination
i hope that helps bro....LISTEN in return can u tell me what you put down for "attempts at peacemaking" its one of he key features and issues....and also with the reasons for communist victory, would u talk bout reasons for us defeat although its not in the other dot points
