yeah Id probably agree with this..There i said it. Far harder. Independent Chem is so hard.
Maybe i am a slope head but its the truth.
Unlucky, Only had you known before the test that they were Independent papers.yeah Id probably agree with this..
our physics half yearly was a combination of the 08 and 09 independent trials and top mark was 72%, I came second with 64% LOL
True I had my business exam yesterday and it was independent and multiple choice was hardIt's pretty hard I guess.
I'd say the physics multiple choice coincides with the selective school's paper. But the short answers are easy peasy.
You said it.i am a slope head its the truth.
Doing course now. Our teacher said they ask wacko questions with monitoring and management and that you should be able to apply info to different situations, but answering the question and then using examples from the stuff you studied.Does anyone know if there is anything about Air Bags and Sodium Azide in Chem M and Managment?!? Doesnt seem like something that would fit into that module and i havent learnt about it.
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Riproot again.You said it.
Doing course now. Our teacher said they ask wacko questions with monitoring and management and that you should be able to apply info to different situations, but answering the question and then using examples from the stuff you studied.
That is exactly what I am saying =='Thanks Anna for your input!. I have found that of the 2 CSSA papers and the 2 Independent papers that i have completed, the independent were more difficult. There is a question that requires you to know the energy profile of reaction and to know what Sodium Azide is. Had i not google'd it then i can promise you in an exam, i would have been so screwed.
This might sound weird, but i hope for at least three 5+ markers in the CSSA trial (school uses this exam) and hopefully a difficult exam.
No, there would be no problems. A lot of schools actually skip pracs, some don't do any at all =='I am not going to start another thread on this, but in class we performed a first hand investigation but we didnt use any cyclic Hydrocarbons, but if i say we did, would there be any problems??
No.I am not going to start another thread on this, but in class we performed a first hand investigation but we didnt use any cyclic Hydrocarbons, but if i say we did, would there be any problems??
I acknowledge the fact that i didnt mention it, but i meant for the trial HSCThat is exactly what I am saying =='
In the HSC, they would tell you what Sodium Azide is
No, there would be no problems. A lot of schools actually skip pracs, some don't do any at all =='
Grab some notes/a text book and write up a concise method for that prac. Also work out the explanations for the observations made in the prac
And the fact that it is more stable then the linear ones. But should it be a problem for the teacher marking it, because we didnt actually use any cyclic hydrocarbons. My school triple marks everything so i would assume it shouldnt be a problem, but i really dont know.No.
I think you could say you used a cycloalkane and a cycloalkene just because they're less toxic or something.
best thing would be just to ask your teacher.I acknowledge the fact that i didnt mention it, but i meant for the trial HSC
And the fact that it is more stable then the linear ones. But should it be a problem for the teacher marking it, because we didnt actually use any cyclic hydrocarbons. My school triple marks everything so i would assume it shouldnt be a problem, but i really dont know.
+1best thing would be just to ask your teacher.
we did the experiment with cyclohexane and cyclohexene.We did perform the prac, but we never used Cyclic Hydrocarbons.
Sorry for the mis-understanding.