I was a bit thrown by the question. By saying imaginative journeys involve around unexpected destinations I interpreted in the following way (due to the texts I used). I said that it wasn't so much the destination which was unexpected rather it was the challenges experienced on the journey which were.
For example my 3 texts:
The Tempest - the final destination of reconciliation was not unexpected rather the journey of Prospero to forgiveness and Miranda and Ferdinand to love was.
Journey to the Interior - did not have a definite conclusion to the journey, challenged the assumption that all journeys have definite endings. No destination, therefore it was the challenges Atwood had to confront in her own mind which were unexpected.
Alice in Wonderland - the cliched ending of Alice having dreamt the whole experience showed that the destination was not unexpected, it was what she experienced in Wonderland that was, and her journey from childhood fear to maturity and courage.
Did I interpret the q right? What was different about your interpretation?
For example my 3 texts:
The Tempest - the final destination of reconciliation was not unexpected rather the journey of Prospero to forgiveness and Miranda and Ferdinand to love was.
Journey to the Interior - did not have a definite conclusion to the journey, challenged the assumption that all journeys have definite endings. No destination, therefore it was the challenges Atwood had to confront in her own mind which were unexpected.
Alice in Wonderland - the cliched ending of Alice having dreamt the whole experience showed that the destination was not unexpected, it was what she experienced in Wonderland that was, and her journey from childhood fear to maturity and courage.
Did I interpret the q right? What was different about your interpretation?