deswa1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2011
- Messages
- 2,256
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2012
Re: 2013 HSC physics marathon
Personally, I would answer like this (remembering that this is just an identify question):
The aether does not exist
Q. Identify a reason postulated for the Null Result given by the MM experiment.
I don't think you even answered the question. You need to give a reason as to why the null result occured.The MM experiment attempted to find the Earth's relative velocity through the use of the aether model however the results suggested that no motion of the Earth relative to the aether which led to scientists of the time to the conclusion that the aether was a flawed idea and it simply did not exist.
However, the MM experiment didn't actually disprove the existence of an aether model but rather it concluded that the earth's velocity relative to the aether was in-measurable.
not sure if im addressing the question here tbh, feel free to rip into my response
I've never heard of those (they could still be right though). About the first, I thought one of the properties of the aether was that it was an absolute frame of reference, encompassed all space etc. -> the Earth can't 'drag' the aether along. For your second, why would you experience length contraction? This is a relativistic effect.That's a good effort Immortalp00n.
I was thinking more along the lines of this as a response:
A null result is produced when an experiment does not produce the expected result. Reasons postulated for the null result of the MM experiment are;
- Massive objects can drag the aether along with it, hence Earth being stationary relative to the aether (the aether was being dragged along by Earth).
- The length in direction of the aether was contracted.
Personally, I would answer like this (remembering that this is just an identify question):
The aether does not exist