MedVision ad

HSC 2016 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (10 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Inquiry: Shouldn't the a and b be in braces instead of parentheses? Or does it actually not matter.
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Inquiry: Shouldn't the a and b be in braces instead of parentheses? Or does it actually not matter.
There shouldn't be brackets of any sorts at all actually.

Also, the integral diverges.
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

After all the integration we did in the 2015 Integration Marathon an ln integration question was asked in question 11. I think this means that this year there will be a few integration questions so continue this forum :)
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Nice and easy one for the 2016ers

 

glittergal96

Active Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
418
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

tan(A-B)=(tan(A)-tan(B))/(1+tan(A)tan(B))

So if A-B is in (-pi/2,pi/2), we have:

A-B=arctan((tan(A)-tan(B))/(1+tan(A)tan(B)))

Let A=arctan(a) and B=arctan(b) and this simplifies to

arctan(a)-arctan(b)=arctan((a-b)/(1+ab))=arccot((1+ab)/(a-b))

Note again that this ia only valid when |LHS| < pi/2.

You can find a general expression casewise for arccot((1+ab)/(a-b)) when this criteria is not satisfied if you like, but I am too lazy to do this right now and we don't need this for b).

b) Let a=x+1, b=x and use our identity, noting that 0 < arctan(x+1)-arctan(x) < 2*arctan(1/2) < pi/2 for all x.

This reduces our integrand to arctan(x+1)-arctan(x).

So the end answer is 1/(1+(x+1)^2)-1/(1+x^2)+const.

You can combine the fractions if you want, but the resulting expresion is not much nicer.
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

tan(A-B)=(tan(A)-tan(B))/(1+tan(A)tan(B))

So if A-B is in (-pi/2,pi/2), we have:

A-B=arctan((tan(A)-tan(B))/(1+tan(A)tan(B)))

Let A=arctan(a) and B=arctan(b) and this simplifies to

arctan(a)-arctan(b)=arctan((a-b)/(1+ab))=arccot((1+ab)/(a-b))

Note again that this ia only valid when |LHS| < pi/2.

You can find a general expression casewise for arccot((1+ab)/(a-b)) when this criteria is not satisfied if you like, but I am too lazy to do this right now and we don't need this for b).

b) Let a=x+1, b=x and use our identity, noting that 0 < arctan(x+1)-arctan(x) < 2*arctan(1/2) < pi/2 for all x.

This reduces our integrand to arctan(x+1)-arctan(x).

So the end answer is 1/(1+(x+1)^2)-1/(1+x^2)+const.

You can combine the fractions if you want, but the resulting expresion is not much nicer.




 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Alternatively







Other method is to just rationalise the numerator straight away and then have a square root of quadratic in the denominator and a linear term in the numerator, which can easily be split up and integrated (bit tedious).
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Other method is to just rationalise the numerator straight away and then have a square root of quadratic in the denominator and a linear term in the numerator, which can easily be split up and integrated (bit tedious).
Yes, I think making the substitution makes it easier to see.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 10)

Top